2008 Ford C-MAX 1.8L Petrol · DN08 RXK

The 2008 Ford C-MAX holds a valid MOT following a pass on 25 September 2025 at 134,092 miles, though the maintenance trend reveals persistent structural advisories rather than outright mechanical failure. The initial test on that date failed on simple lighting faults—an offside front position lamp, registration plate lamps, and an incorrect rear indicator—which were promptly rectified for the pass an hour later. Beneath these minor electrical fixes, the tester flagged a recurring oil leak and rear anti-roll bar corrosion. This pattern suggests a vehicle kept on the road with basic repairs, while long-term surface rust on suspension components is monitored rather than replaced. Accumulating 134,092 miles over eighteen years equates to roughly 7,450 miles per year, a figure typical of light use or extended periods of standing. The mileage progression shows a modest 3,359 miles covered between the November 2024 test at 130,733 miles and the September 2025 test at 134,092 miles. Such low recent accumulation implies the vehicle has seen minimal demanding use, which can prevent heavy drivetrain wear but may contribute to the corrosion advisories seen on the undercarriage due to moisture sitting on static components. A physical inspection must prioritize the vehicle's structural integrity, given the recurring corrosion advisories. The tester repeatedly noted corroded front and rear coil springs, a corroded front sub-frame, and a degraded rear anti-roll bar. While currently deemed not seriously weakened, this level of widespread corrosion across the suspension and chassis demands a thorough undercarriage examination to rule out perforation or compromised mounting points. The persistent oil leak, flagged as gearbox-related in November 2024 and again in September 2025, requires immediate identification of the source to prevent long-term mechanical damage. Brake system condition also warrants close scrutiny. In November 2023 at 127,542 miles, the tester flagged worn and pitted rear brake discs alongside a fluctuating nearside rear service brake. Although the vehicle passed the subsequent 2025 test without brake advisories, the prior pitting and fluctuation suggest potential issues with caliper binding or uneven disc wear that may have been partially resolved or simply fell outside the failure threshold. A test drive should assess for any pulling or pulsation under braking, and a wheel removal will reveal the current state of the rear disc faces and pad thickness.