2016 Ford Fiesta 1.2L Petrol · DP65 NTO

The 2016 Ford Fiesta’s most recent MOT test on January 12, 2026, resulted in a rare dual entry—one pass and one fail at the same mileage (72,400) without recorded defects. This anomaly suggests either an administrative error or a brief, isolated issue resolved before final inspection. The preceding tests from January 2025 (60,998 miles) and January 2024 (65,928 miles) show a consistent pass with no advisories, indicating stable roadworthiness over the past two years. The lack of recurring faults implies that major components—such as suspension bushes, coil springs, or binding calipers—have not failed repeatedly, though this does not preclude hidden wear. The absence of advisories on emissions, exhaust integrity, or structural corrosion further supports a vehicle that has been maintained at a basic level, though not necessarily beyond standard servicing intervals. Mileage progression reveals a steady accumulation of approximately 7,240 miles annually, which aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age. The gap between tests remains consistent at around 12 months, with no prolonged periods of inactivity or rapid mileage spikes that might suggest deferred maintenance. The most notable outlier is the January 2026 dual entry, which warrants verification—either to confirm whether the fail was for a minor, easily rectified issue (such as a loose wheel nut or minor corrosion) or if it indicates a more serious, unresolved problem. The absence of mileage jumps or extended periods off the road also reduces the likelihood of severe neglect, though it does not rule out deferred servicing of non-MOT-critical items like timing belts or differential fluid. Given the clean MOT history, a prospective buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of suspension components, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, as these are common failure points in Fiestas of this age. The dual January 2026 entry, despite passing, raises suspicion about potential brake drag or minor corrosion—check for uneven brake pad wear, binding calipers, or rust on the subframe or sills. Tyre condition should also be scrutinised, as the lack of advisories on tread depth does not guarantee consistent wear patterns. Finally, verify the service history for evidence of timing belt replacement (if applicable) and differential or gearbox fluid changes, as these are not MOT-tested but critical to long-term reliability. The vehicle’s history suggests it has been driven responsibly, but no record can fully replace a thorough mechanical examination.