2010 Citroen C4 1.6L Diesel · DY10 OXA

The Citroën C4’s most recent MOT test on 24 March 2026 at 140,970 miles confirms it remains roadworthy, with no defects or advisories recorded. This marks the fourth consecutive pass in the last three tests, suggesting the vehicle has been maintained at a basic level without major recurring failures. The absence of advisories or defects across all tests implies no obvious pattern of neglect or deferred repairs, though this does not preclude hidden wear or deferred maintenance beyond the MOT’s scope. The recent pass is timely, having occurred just four months ago, which aligns with the three-year MOT cycle for this model. The recorded mileage of 140,970 miles over 16 years equates to approximately 8,800 miles annually, a rate consistent with typical light-to-moderate usage for a vehicle of this age. There are no extended gaps in mileage that would suggest prolonged storage, nor are there abrupt jumps that would indicate aggressive driving. The most notable interval is between the February 2024 failure and the March 2024 pass, where the mileage increased by just 10 miles—a minor anomaly that likely reflects a retest rather than significant usage. Overall, the mileage progression appears steady and unremarkable for a vehicle of this generation. Given the lack of recorded defects or advisories, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should centre on components not routinely assessed by the MOT. The suspension—particularly the rear bushes and coil springs—will require scrutiny for excessive wear or corrosion, as will the brake system for uneven pad thickness, glazed discs, or binding calipers. The subframe and wheel arches should be examined for signs of structural corrosion, which can compromise wheel bearing integrity or steering stability. Additionally, the exhaust system’s integrity should be checked for leaks or rust-through, especially around the catalytic converter and oxygen sensors, as these are common failure points in this model. Tyre condition, while not flagged in tests, should be verified for remaining tread depth and uniformity, as the absence of MOT defects does not guarantee prior neglect in this area.