2015 Nissan Micra 1.2L Petrol · DY15 ACV

This 2015 Nissan Micra has maintained a clean MOT history with no defects recorded across five consecutive tests, most recently passing on 25 November 2025 at 35,258 miles. The absence of advisories or failings suggests the vehicle has been subjected to consistent, if not rigorous, maintenance over the past decade. However, the most recent test occurred just six months ago, which is acceptable but not ideal given the low mileage—buyers should verify whether the current owner has adhered to service intervals beyond MOT requirements, particularly for fluid changes and suspension components. The recorded mileage of 35,258 miles over 11 years—roughly 3,200 miles annually—indicates light usage, which could imply either minimal driving or prolonged periods of storage. There are no abrupt mileage jumps or extended gaps between tests that would raise concern, though the 13-month interval between the January 2024 and November 2024 tests (29,863 to 32,762 miles) is unusually long for a vehicle of this age. This suggests either a deliberate deferral of the MOT or a period of inactivity. Buyers should confirm whether the vehicle was driven regularly during this gap or stored, as prolonged non-use can accelerate issues like battery degradation or suspension corrosion. Given the lack of recorded defects, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should centre on wear items that are not routinely checked by MOT testers. The suspension—particularly rear bushes, coil springs, and shock absorbers—should be examined for uneven wear or fluid leaks, as these are not visually inspected during an MOT. Brake discs and pads, while not failed here, may have worn unevenly; check for lateral grooving or excessive thickness reduction. Tyres, though not flagged, should be inspected for uneven tread wear or embedded debris, which could indicate alignment or suspension issues. Finally, assess the underbody for corrosion around wheel arches, sills, and exhaust components, as low mileage does not preclude rust progression in exposed areas. The absence of MOT advisories does not guarantee these components are sound—visual and functional verification is essential.