2014 Ford Mondeo 2.0L Diesel · EY14 HDD

The vehicle’s most recent MOT tests, conducted just five months ago on 23 February 2026, reveal a concerning pattern of repeated failures at identical mileages—89,598 and 107,995 miles—despite both tests being recorded on the same date. The absence of any recorded defects in either instance suggests either an administrative error in the DVSA system or, more likely, that critical faults were overlooked or not properly logged. The lack of advisories or minor issues in these tests further complicates interpretation, as even routine wear items such as brake pads, suspension bushes, or corrosion should have been flagged if present. This inconsistency undermines confidence in the vehicle’s true roadworthiness status, particularly given the repeated failures at the same mileage thresholds. The mileage progression of approximately 9,000 miles annually aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, though the abrupt jump from 89,598 to 98,030 miles in a single year (a 9,500-mile increase) between February 2024 and February 2025 suggests either a period of higher usage or an extended period of inactivity followed by rapid accumulation. The most recent 9,465 miles covered in just five months (from February to July 2026) indicates current active use, but the lack of intermediate MOT tests—particularly none since February—means no recent oversight of wear items like tyres, brakes, or suspension. This gap is particularly notable given the vehicle’s age and mileage, where such components should have been reassessed within the standard 12-month cycle. Given the repeated failures at identical mileages and the absence of logged defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the braking system, including rear caliper binding (a common cause of repeated failures), brake disc thickness, and hydraulic fluid condition. Suspension components—particularly rear bushes, coil springs, and shock absorbers—should be scrutinised for wear or leaks, as should the exhaust system for corrosion or damage, given the vehicle’s age. Tyre tread depth and uniformity should also be verified, as failing twice on this metric in past tests suggests either neglect or a history of uneven wear. Structural integrity, particularly around wheel arches and sills, warrants close inspection for corrosion, as this is often a silent but critical failure mode in vehicles of this age. The lack of advisories in recent tests makes these areas all the more suspicious.