2010 Audi A6 2.0L Diesel · F1 SOR

The 2010 Audi A6 presents a clean MOT history over the past three years, with the most recent test on 23 October 2025 at 112,929 miles showing no defects—an outcome consistent with the three preceding annual passes in 2024, 2023, and the earlier 2022 retest. The only anomaly is the duplicate entry on 13 October 2022 , where the vehicle failed initially but passed the same day at identical mileage, suggesting a minor administrative error rather than a mechanical issue. This stability indicates no recurring faults or deteriorating trends in core systems, though the lack of advisories means some wear items—such as tyres, brakes, or suspension components—may have been addressed just below threshold levels. The absence of corrosion-related failures also implies the underseal and bodywork have held up reasonably well, but this cannot be confirmed without a closer inspection. The mileage accumulation of 7,058 miles per year aligns closely with the vehicle’s age, suggesting either steady but not excessive use or periods of inactivity balanced by bursts of driving. The 5,133-mile gap between the 2022 and 2023 tests (98,237 to 103,106 miles) is the most notable, potentially indicating a longer storage period or significantly reduced usage. Subsequent years show a more consistent pattern, with 4,690 miles added in 2023 and 4,690 again in 2024 , before the latest 5,133-mile increment in 2025 . While not alarming, this variability could reflect changes in ownership or usage patterns—something a buyer should verify against service records. Given the MOT’s clean slate, a prospective purchaser should prioritise a thorough inspection of brake system components , particularly the rear calipers and pads , as binding brakes were not recorded but could have been rectified just before testing. The suspension bushes, coil springs, and ball joints should also be checked for wear, as these are common high-mileage failure points in Audi A6 models of this era. Exhaust emissions were not flagged, but a visual and functional check for leaks or catalytic converter efficiency would be prudent. Finally, while no structural corrosion was noted, the wheel arches, sills, and rear trailing arms should be examined for hidden rust, especially if the vehicle has spent time in damp or salty conditions. The absence of advisories does not guarantee these areas are flawless—only that they met minimum legal standards at test time.