2004 Yamaha Raptor 0.7L Petrol · FB53 ETL

The most recent MOT test for this 2004 Yamaha Raptor was conducted on 27 April 2022 , and it passed without any recorded defects. This suggests a stable maintenance record at the time, though the absence of subsequent tests means the vehicle has not undergone a roadworthiness check in over four years. Given the age of the vehicle, a current MOT would be essential to confirm ongoing compliance with UK safety and emissions standards. The lack of advisories or repeated failures in the single available test implies no obvious recurring issues were identified by the tester, but this does not preclude unseen wear or deferred maintenance. Mileage data is entirely absent from the record, preventing any assessment of usage patterns relative to the vehicle’s age. Without recorded mileage figures, it is impossible to determine whether the vehicle has been stored, lightly used, or subjected to heavy duty. The gap between tests—over four years—also obscures whether the vehicle has accumulated significant wear or if it has remained in a static condition. For a buyer, this absence of mileage context introduces an element of uncertainty regarding the actual condition of high-wear components like the engine, transmission, or suspension. Given the sparse MOT history, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of critical areas that are not covered by the MOT but are common failure points in vehicles of this age. Focus on the suspension components , particularly the shock absorbers, bushes, and coil springs , for signs of degradation or leaks. The brake system —including calipers, pads, and discs —should be checked for uneven wear or binding, as these issues often develop over time without being flagged in a basic MOT. Additionally, inspect the exhaust system for corrosion or leaks, which can compromise both performance and emissions. Given the vehicle’s age, structural integrity , particularly around the frame rails and wheel arches , should also be examined for rust or weakening, as these can pose long-term safety risks. The absence of recent tests means no confirmation exists that these areas remain serviceable.