2008 Mazda MX5 1.8L Petrol · FD08 VSK

The most recent MOT test on August 8, 2025, at 89,615 miles confirmed the vehicle passed without defects, though the preceding history reveals a pattern of deferred maintenance rather than outright failure. The anti-roll bar dust covers were flagged as severely deteriorated in August 2024, yet no follow-up action appears recorded—suggesting either a temporary repair or continued neglect. Front brake pads were noted as "wearing thin" in August 2023, a warning that should have prompted replacement before the current test, while tyres were worn close to the legal limit in September 2022. The absence of advisories or further defects in the latest pass implies the vehicle remains drivable, but the trend of deferred critical components raises concerns about long-term reliability. The recorded mileage of 89,615 miles over 18 years—approximately 4,979 miles annually—is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, particularly given its sporty nature. The gap between tests is consistent at around 12 months, with no abrupt spikes or prolonged periods of inactivity, though the slow accumulation suggests either limited use or extended storage. The lack of higher mileage means suspension bushes, coil springs, and drivetrain components may have experienced less wear than expected, but it also implies consumables like brake pads, tyres, and bushings could have been stretched beyond their intended lifespan. A buyer should prioritise an immediate inspection of the rear anti-roll bar linkages, as the 2024 dust cover failures indicate potential internal corrosion or lubrication failure—a condition that can compromise handling. Front brake pads should be measured for remaining thickness, as the 2023 advisory suggests they may now be critically worn. Tyres require close scrutiny for uneven wear or edge damage, particularly if the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods. Additionally, check for signs of suspension wear, such as loose or cracked bushes, and inspect the exhaust system for corrosion, especially around the rear subframe. The absence of structural rust advisories in recent tests is reassuring, but a thorough underbody examination is still advisable given the vehicle’s age.