2017 Citroen Relay 2.0L Diesel · FJ17 RZR

The vehicle currently holds a roadworthy status but the history reveals a worsening trend in mechanical component integrity. While it passed the most recent test in April 2026 at 132,674 miles, this followed a significant failure just four miles prior. The presence of an inoperative engine malfunction light and a missing brake pedal anti-slip provision indicates serious electronic and safety system neglects addressed only immediately before the pass. The persistence of suspension and steering defects across multiple tests suggests that the front end is reaching the end of its functional life. At 132,674 miles over nine years, this Relay has averaged approximately 14,700 miles per year, which is consistent with heavy commercial use. The data shows a high rate of mileage accumulation in the recent months. Between March 2025 and April 2026, the vehicle covered over 1,400 miles in just thirteen months, indicating it remains a constant working tool. This high frequency of use puts significant strain on the drivetrain and chassis components, which is reflected in the recurring failures of rubber bushes and mechanical joints. A buyer must conduct a thorough physical inspection of the front suspension and steering system. The record consistently flags worn bushes on both the nearside and offside suspension arms alongside play in the steering rack inner joints. These issues are not merely cosmetic wear and will affect handling precision and tyre longevity. Furthermore, the nearside front service brake binding noted in April 2026 requires investigation into potentially seized caliper pistons or sticking sliders to prevent premature pad wear or overheating. The parking brake also warrants attention as it failed the efficiency test in March 2025 with performance less than half of the required value. Given the recent engine malfunction light failure in 2026, a diagnostic scan is essential to ensure no hidden fault codes remain that were simply cleared without proper repair. The vehicle shows a pattern of reactive maintenance where faults are only addressed when they cause a failure rather than through preventative replacement.