2009 Iveco Daily 35S12 MWB 2.3L Diesel · FJ59 OEB

The most recent MOT test on 2025-09-08 confirms the vehicle passed with no recorded defects at 132,654 miles, though this follows an unusually high failure rate in the preceding months. The two consecutive failures in late 2023 and early 2025—both at over 131,000 miles—suggest either a temporary oversight in pre-test maintenance or genuine recurring issues that were resolved between tests. The pattern of failing twice within a year before passing again implies inconsistent upkeep rather than a stable mechanical trend. Without specific advisory notes from the failures, the cause remains speculative, but the repeated retesting at similar mileages warrants scrutiny of high-wear components. The recorded mileage of 132,654 miles over 17 years equates to approximately 7,800 miles annually, which is typical for a commercial van of this age. There are no obvious gaps in service intervals, though the 12-week gap between the 2023 failures (December 5 and December 15) is unusually short for a vehicle requiring retesting. The lack of mileage spikes or prolonged periods of inactivity suggests consistent use, which may accelerate wear on suspension bushes, drivetrain seals, and brake components. The most recent test date, just under a year ago, means the vehicle is due for another MOT shortly, but the absence of defects in the last pass does not preclude gradual deterioration in areas not routinely inspected. Given the history, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear axle and leaf springs, as these are common failure points in older commercial vehicles. The repeated failures hint at potential issues with brake binding or uneven wear, so caliper function and disc thickness should be checked, alongside the condition of the brake hoses for leaks or corrosion. Structural integrity is also critical—look for signs of frame rust, particularly around welds and underbody panels, as well as wear on the exhaust system, which may have been overlooked in previous tests. The absence of advisory notes in the MOT history means these areas could have been passed without deeper scrutiny, so a professional inspection is essential.