2015 Nissan Navara 2.5L Diesel · FP65 BZU

The Nissan Navara’s most recent MOT test on 2025-04-16—just under a year ago—confirmed its roadworthiness with no defects recorded at 108,194 miles. This suggests the vehicle has passed its most recent inspection without major failings, though the immediate preceding test on 2025-04-04 at 107,247 miles was a failure with no recorded defects, indicating either a procedural anomaly or a brief lapse in pre-test preparation. The pattern from 2022 to 2025 shows no consistent mechanical issues, but the repeated failures at the same mileage in 2024 and 2025—just one mile apart—raise questions about whether the vehicle was presented for testing in a suboptimal condition or if minor oversights were overlooked. Overall, the trend is stable in terms of structural integrity and major systems, but the lack of defects in failures is unusual and warrants closer scrutiny. The recorded mileage of 108,194 miles over approximately 11 years equates to roughly 9,836 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age and class. There are notable gaps in testing: the last pre-2022 test is absent, and the 2024-2025 interval shows a compressed cycle with two tests within a month. The rapid accumulation of mileage between 2022 (78,728 miles) and 2024 (93,865 miles) suggests consistent use, though the lack of intermediate MOTs prevents confirmation of intermediate maintenance. The absence of advisories or recurring faults implies that major components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or drivetrain elements have not yet reached critical wear thresholds, but the mileage suggests these areas should now be inspected thoroughly. Given the sparse defect history, a buyer should prioritise an in-person inspection of high-wear items such as the suspension system—particularly the rear axle and steering linkages—for signs of bush deterioration or binding. The brakes, while not explicitly failed, should be checked for uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle was driven hard between tests. Exhaust emissions, though not recorded as failed, may warrant a visual check for leaks or catalytic converter efficiency given the age. Structural corrosion, particularly around wheel arches, subframe, and sills, should be examined closely, as this is a common failure point for vehicles of this vintage and mileage. The lack of advisories in past tests does not guarantee these areas are currently sound, so a detailed mechanical assessment is essential.