2010 Nissan Qashqai 1.5L Diesel · FT10 ENC

The Nissan Qashqai’s MOT history presents a striking anomaly: two consecutive fails in January 2026, both without recorded defects, followed by an immediate pass on the 13th at 188,664 miles. This pattern suggests a procedural irregularity rather than a mechanical issue, as no advisories or defects were logged in any of the five tests spanning 2024–2026. The vehicle’s recent MOTs—all within the last six months—demonstrate no evidence of recurring faults, structural corrosion, or deteriorating components. The absence of advisories on critical areas like suspension bushes, brake binding, or exhaust emissions implies that, on paper, the car meets current roadworthiness standards without immediate red flags. However, the dual fails in January 2026 raise questions about tester consistency or potential undocumented repairs, warranting closer scrutiny of the vehicle’s actual condition. Mileage accumulation aligns closely with typical expectations for a 16-year-old vehicle, averaging around 11,792 miles per year—a rate that suggests consistent but not excessive use. The gaps between tests are uniform, with annual MOTs at roughly the same mileage intervals (e.g., 164,832 miles in January 2024 to 177,676 miles in January 2025). There’s no indication of rapid mileage spikes or prolonged inactivity, which could otherwise signal neglect or heavy usage. The most recent 11,000-mile jump between January 2025 and January 2026 is unremarkable, reinforcing the impression of steady, moderate driving rather than sporadic or aggressive use. Given the clean MOT record, a buyer should still verify key areas in person. The lack of advisories on brakes, steering, or suspension doesn’t eliminate the need to check for binding calipers, worn coil springs, or degraded suspension bushes—common high-mileage wear points. Structural integrity should be confirmed, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and exhaust mounts, where corrosion can develop insidiously. The dual fails in January 2026, despite no defects, could hint at a tester error or a last-minute repair, so reviewing service records for recent brake, tyre, or emission-related work would be prudent. Tyre condition, though not flagged, should be inspected for uneven wear or age-related cracking, as the vehicle’s tread depth hasn’t been documented in these tests.