2009 Suzuki Swift 1.5L Petrol · GF09 FBJ

The Suzuki Swift’s most recent MOT history, conducted just over a year ago on 28 July 2025 , reveals a concerning pattern of repeated test failures without recorded defects—an anomaly that suggests either administrative errors in the system or, more likely, repeated attempts to pass the vehicle without addressing underlying issues. The final outcome was a pass, but the duplication of a failed test at identical mileage (125,569) raises questions about whether critical components were overlooked or if the tester missed subtle faults. The preceding test in August 2024 also ended in failure before passing shortly after, indicating a history of last-minute corrections rather than consistent maintenance. Without specific advisory notes, the record implies either a lack of thorough pre-MOT checks or a tendency to defer necessary repairs. The vehicle’s mileage progression— 125,569 miles today , averaging roughly 7,386 miles per year —falls within the expected range for its age, suggesting neither excessive neglect nor aggressive use. However, the 1,243-mile gap between the July 2024 failure and August 2024 pass (117,320 to 117,556) is unusually brief for a vehicle requiring major attention, while the 2023 to 2024 interval (106,754 to 117,556) spans 10,802 miles —a more typical service interval. This inconsistency hints at sporadic maintenance rather than a disciplined schedule. The lack of advisory notes in any test further obscures whether minor issues were addressed or if the vehicle was driven with unresolved concerns. Given the repeated failures and the absence of defect records, a prospective buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of suspension components , particularly the rear suspension bushes and coil springs , as these are common failure points in this model at this mileage. The brake system warrants scrutiny, especially the rear calipers and discs , given the history of test failures—binding brakes or uneven wear could have been missed during MOTs. Structural integrity should also be assessed, focusing on floor pans, subframe, and wheel arches for corrosion, as rust in these areas often goes unnoticed until it compromises safety. Finally, the exhaust system and emissions controls may have been patched rather than properly repaired, so visual inspection for leaks or improper modifications is essential. The lack of advisory notes in recent tests makes these areas particularly suspect.