2009 Hyundai I30 2.0L Petrol · GX09 FZL

The vehicle is currently in a state of poor roadworthiness with a trend of worsening mechanical neglect. The most recent test in October 2025 at 171,002 miles resulted in a significant failure involving multiple critical defects across the braking and suspension systems. While the car passed in previous years, the transition from minor advisories to outright failures of the parking brake, rear brake pads, and heavily worn suspension bushes indicates that essential maintenance is being deferred until test deadlines rather than being addressed on a preventative basis. At 171,002 miles, the car has covered its mileage at a consistent rate of approximately 10,000 miles per year, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. The data shows steady usage patterns, with roughly 5,500 miles driven between the September 2024 and 2025 tests, and another 4,500 enough in the year prior. While the mileage is regular, the high mileage places considerable stress on aging rubber components and mechanical wear items, which is evident in the recurring issues noted throughout the record. A buyer must conduct a thorough inspection of the artwork to assess structural integrity, as corrosion has been a documented issue since at least 2022. The tester has repeatedly flagged areas corrosion and surface rust on the exhaust silencer, which poses a risk of future structural failure if left untreated. The suspension also requires immediate attention; the 2025 failure identified heavily worn rear suspension arm bushes, and the persistent misting on both front shock absorbers indicates they are nearing the end of their functional life. The braking system is another area of concern. The October 2025 failure revealed an inoperative rear parking brake, thin rear pads, and significantly worn rear brake discs. This follows a long history of pitted and scored discs dating back to 2023, showing a clear decline in braking system maintenance. Furthermore, the tyres have consistently been flagged as being near the legal limit or worn unevenly across all five tests, suggesting that basic consumable upkeep is only performed when strictly necessary to pass the MOT.