2020 Ford Ranger 3.2L Diesel · GY70 AAU
2020 Ford Ranger (3.2L, diesel). First registered 25 Sept 2020. Recorded mileage 102,849 miles. MOT valid until 24 Sept 2027. Taxed until 01 Sept 2026.
- Make & Model
- FORD RANGER
- Year / Origin
- 2020 · Canterbury
- Safety Recall
- Unknown
- MOT Status
- Valid until 24 Sept 2027
- Road Tax
- Taxed (01 Sept 2026)
- Recorded Mileage
- 102,849 mi
- ULEZ Compliance
- ULEZ Compliant (Euro 6)
- Fuel & Engine
- Diesel · 3.2L
- Reliability Guide
- Common Faults
Thinking of buying this vehicle? Free MOT and tax checks do not cover legal ownership. If outstanding finance exists, finance companies have legal right to repossess without compensation.
GY70 AAU Key Findings
- 5 MOT tests recorded
- Latest MOT passed on 25/09/2026
- 102,849 miles recorded at latest MOT
- 1 historical MOT failure
- 1 defect noted at the latest MOT
- Recurring brakes items (4 mentions)
Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.
GY70 AAU MOT History
Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.
5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2020 Ford Ranger (GY70 AAU) between September 2023 and September 2026.
The record contains 4 passes and 1 failure.
The most recent test on 25 September 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 1 failure that buyers may want to investigate.
Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Brakes (4 issues), Tyres (3 issues), Lighting (2 issues). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.
In total 4 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.
Recorded failure items include: “Offside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii))”; “Nearside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii))”; “Brake performance unable to be tested (1.2.1 (g))”.
GY70 AAU Mileage History
- 26/09/202357,754 mi
- 11/09/202473,858 mi+16,104 mi
- 12/09/202473,866 mi+8 mi
- 22/09/202585,112 mi+11,246 mi
- 25/09/2026102,849 mi+17,737 mi
Average of roughly 15,042 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.
Technical Specifications
Core Specifications
Identification & Status
Dimensions & Weights
Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence
Estimate current market value
Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.
Known faults for Ford Ford Ranger (T6)
Our database tracks 6 specific mechanical faults and recurring failure patterns identified across UK MOT testing stations for this generation.
MOT Roadworthiness: Excellent
This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.
Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.
Digital Service History
Access verified franchised dealer maintenance records for GY70AAU.
Unlock Manufacturer Digital Service Records
Check franchised dealer maintenance history for GY70AAU. Our direct integration verifies routine service events, workshop operations, recorded mileage, and technician logs.
Buyer's Guide & Inspection Advisory
Expert automotive synthesis from historical MOT defect records and market benchmarks.
Our Verdict
This Ford Ranger is a solid prospect for those needing a high-capacity diesel workhorse. Given its relatively clean recent MOT history and consistent usage, it represents a sensible option for a high-mileage utility vehicle.
When inspecting this specific orange Ranger, focus on the heavy-duty components. Because the mileage is above the model average, you should verify if the major service intervals for the 3198cc diesel engine have been met. Ask for evidence of oil changes and filter replacements, as high-mileage diesel engines are sensitive to maintenance schedules.
Negotiate based on the mileage; while the vehicle is performing well in tests, it has been driven more than the average Ranger in this dataset. Check the condition of the load bed and any towing equipment if it has been used for its intended purpose, as this can impact the wear on the suspension and drivetrain.
With a large 3.2L engine, fuel economy will be a significant factor in your monthly budget, likely being lower than smaller diesel alternatives. Tax and insurance groups for a vehicle of this size and engine capacity tend to be higher than standard passenger cars.
Maintenance costs for this model can be substantial due to the size of components like tyres and brakes. Expect annual running costs to be higher than an average hatchback, factoring in the higher fuel consumption and the potential for more expensive parts replacements on a large 4x4 platform.
Pay close attention to the lighting and suspension components. Aggregate data for this model shows headlamps, coil springs, and tyres as the most common MOT failure reasons. While this specific vehicle had no defects in its 2025 test, these are the areas most likely to require attention on a Ranger of this age and mileage.
Check the tyre tread depth and sidewall condition, as well as any signs of uneven wear which could indicate suspension issues. Given the 2024 MOT failure at 73,858 miles, ensure that whatever issue caused that failure has been fully addressed and is not a recurring problem.
Registered in September 2020, this 3.2L diesel Ranger has covered 85,112 miles in approximately six years. This equates to roughly 14,000 miles per year, which is higher than the model average of 9,711 miles. The MOT history shows a recent pass in September 2025 with no defects, following a brief failure in 2024 that was promptly rectified.
Aggregate data for the Ford Ranger shows a 79.9% average MOT pass rate, with common issues relating to headlamps, coil springs, and tyres.
Reviewed by the IsItAGoodCar editorial team — Verified automotive analysis synthesized from official vehicle registries.
Data Sources
DVSA
Official MOT test logs & failure reasons
DVLA
Tax, registration & powertrain specs
Experian
Finance, stolen markers & total loss
AI Analysis
Historical fault & advisory patterns
Similar Vehicles
Similar Vehicles Checked Recently
Plate Neighbors
Batch Registration Neighbors (GY70 Series)
Vehicles registered in the same regional DVLA batch as GY70AAU.
PANHARD
LEVASSER X69
MERCEDES-BENZ
A
KIA
XCEED 3 ISG
KIA
PICANTO
MERCEDES-BENZ
A 250 AMG LINE E AUTO
KIA
SPORTAGE 3 CRDI ISG MHEV S-A
KIA
NIRO
MERCEDES-BENZ
A 250 AMG LINE PREMIUM + E A
MERCEDES-BENZ
EQC 400 AMG LINE PREMIUM + 4M
MERCEDES-BENZ
EQC 400 AMG LINE PREMIUM 4M
TRIUMPH
BONNEVILLE
MERCEDES-BENZ
EQC 400 AMG LINE PREMIUM 4M
FORD RANGER Model Intelligence & Reliability
Verified MOT failure trends, buying advice, and technical directory specifications.
Owner-reported defects, recurring MOT failure points, and estimated repair costs.
Browse production generations, registration statistics, and trim variants.
Historical MOT pass rates and DVLA records for 2020 model year cars.
- Common-Rail Fuel Injector Failure and RecallSerious
Both early 2.2 and 3.2 Duratorq diesels and early 2.0 EcoBlue engines suffer from injector failure. In 2015, Ford recalled nearly 14,000 UK Rangers for faulty injector batches that caused engines to cut out without warning while driving. Failed injectors suffer from high leak-back rates or internal nozzle jamming, leading to cylinder bore wash, uneven fueling, violent knocking, and melted pistons.
- Manual and Automatic Transmission Shudder and Shift FaultsModerate
Manual T6 Rangers frequently suffer from stiff third-gear selection, worn synchromesh rings, and dual-mass flywheel rattle under heavy towing. Automatic variants (6R80 6-speed and later 10R80 10-speed) can exhibit harsh low-speed shifting, gear slip flare, and torque converter shudder. In addition, an official recall addressed gearshift selector cables that could unclip and foul the rear driveshaft.
- Chassis Box Section Corrosion and Rear Spring Hanger RotSerious
The T6 Ranger features a fully boxed steel ladder chassis that readily traps road salt, farm slurry, and abrasive mud washed into internal frame openings. Without regular high-pressure flushing and cavity rustproofing, the metal corrodes from the inside out. Structural rot attacks the rear spring hanger brackets, spare wheel cross-member, and chassis rails around the fuel tank, causing catastrophic MOT structural failure.
Regional DVLA Registration Directory
Vehicles and registration batches issued by regional DVLA offices across the UK.
Recently Checked UK Vehicles
Live vehicle history checks and MOT records recently queried by UK car buyers.