2016 Ford Transit 2.2L Diesel · HJ13 JUD

This 2016 Ford Transit has demonstrated a consistent but concerning maintenance pattern, with the most recent MOT test occurring just over a year ago on 2025-07-11. The vehicle passed both its 2024 and 2023 tests without any recorded defects, though the dual entries for 2024 and 2025—each showing a pass followed by an immediate fail at identical mileages—suggest either an administrative error or a deliberate retest after a minor oversight. The lack of advisories or defects across three consecutive tests implies no major mechanical failures, but the repeated retesting at the same mileage raises suspicion of neglected pre-MOT servicing or a test centre’s failure to spot minor issues. The current test is now overdue by nearly a year, which is unacceptable for a vehicle of this age and mileage, particularly given the average annual distance covered. The recorded mileage progression—from 93,266 miles in July 2023 to 117,170 miles in July 2025—indicates a steady accumulation of approximately 11,700 miles annually, which is typical for a commercial or mixed-use vehicle. There are no evident gaps in usage, nor does the mileage suggest prolonged periods of inactivity, though the lack of intermediate MOTs or service records means critical wear patterns cannot be confirmed. The absence of any advisories or defects in the available tests also means there is no direct evidence of deferred maintenance, but the dual pass/fail entries for 2024 and 2025 warrant scrutiny. Buyers should verify whether these retests were due to genuine oversight or whether the vehicle was driven between tests, which could accelerate wear on components like suspension bushes, brake pads, and drivetrain fluids. Given the sparse defect history, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should centre on components prone to wear at this mileage: the suspension system, particularly the rear coil springs and bushes, which often degrade silently; the brake system, including rear binding calipers or warped discs if the vehicle was driven between tests; and structural integrity, especially around wheel arches and sills, where corrosion could compromise safety. The lack of advisories does not preclude hidden issues—tyre tread depth, for instance, may have been borderline at test time, and failing twice on the same mileage suggests basic upkeep, such as fluid checks or minor servicing, was either skipped or inadequately addressed. A thorough brake fluid flush, suspension inspection for leaks or excessive play, and a detailed corrosion assessment are essential to confirm the vehicle’s true condition.