2013 Peugeot 2008 1.6L Diesel · KA57 SEE

The vehicle passed its most recent MOT on 2025-08-14, meaning the test is just over eight months old as of today, 2026-06-15, and remains valid. However, the maintenance trend shows a clear pattern of recurring brake wear and suspension concerns over the past three years, indicating the vehicle is not experiencing stable mechanical condition—issues that were previously minor have continued to develop, albeit not catastrophically. The sole failure in the last four years was in August 2022, when a seriously weakened front brake disc and excessively worn suspension ball joint triggered a fail, but both have since been addressed to a passing standard, albeit with advisories persisting. Mileage increased from 82,017 miles in early August 2022 to 96,516 miles by August 2024, a gain of 14,500 miles in just over two years—consistent with average annual usage. However, no mileage was recorded for the 2025 test, and the gap between the August 2024 and August 2025 MOTs suggests either low usage or a test conducted without a mileage check, which is permitted if the vehicle is over ten years old. The absence of a mileage entry for the latest test makes it impossible to confirm whether wear rates have accelerated or slowed in the past year. A buyer should pay close attention to the front and rear brake systems, particularly the discs and pads, which have shown progressive wear over three consecutive tests; the front discs were flagged twice in two years, and rear discs appeared in 2023—suggesting possible driving habits, lack of brake maintenance, or poor-quality components. The persistent advisories on the offside front suspension arm ball joint, first noted as slight play in 2025 and previously failing as excessive wear in 2022, indicate the need for a thorough suspension inspection, including related bushes and mounting points. The oil leak, though not excessive, should be traced to its source, as recurring leaks often point to deteriorating seals or gaskets. Structural rust or corrosion was not mentioned in any test, but given the car’s age and the brake/suspension wear, a visual underbody check would be prudent before purchase.