2012 Toyota Aygo 1.0L Petrol · KP62 ABV

The most recent MOT test on December 29, 2025, confirms this Toyota Aygo passed without defects, though it follows a failed test just thirteen days earlier at the same mileage (79,917). The pattern of consecutive passes and fails—particularly the back-to-back tests in December 2025—suggests either a rushed last-minute inspection or a vehicle that narrowly avoided minor failings. The absence of any recorded defects in the March 2025 or March 2024 tests implies consistent compliance with basic MOT standards, though the repeated December 2025 retest raises curiosity about whether the tester focused on high-risk areas like suspension alignment, brake binding, or exhaust integrity. No advisories appear in the record, which is unusual given the vehicle’s age; this could indicate either thorough pre-test maintenance or a lack of pre-existing wear that would warrant warnings. The recorded mileage of 79,945 miles over fourteen years—approximately 5,710 miles annually—is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, suggesting either light urban use or prolonged periods of inactivity. The gap between the March 2024 and March 2025 tests (12 months) aligns with the standard MOT cycle, but the December 2025 retest indicates the vehicle was driven or moved just 82 miles between the two tests. This suggests the owner may have delayed the MOT due to proximity to the expiry date rather than regular servicing. The lack of mileage progression between tests also makes it difficult to assess wear trends on high-mileage components like suspension bushes or transmission fluid degradation. Given the absence of recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of suspension components—particularly rear bushes and coil springs—for excessive wear or corrosion, as these are common failure points in vehicles of this age and mileage. The repeated December 2025 tests hint at potential brake issues, so caliper binding, uneven disc wear, or master cylinder leaks should be checked. Exhaust integrity is another critical area; the lack of advisories does not rule out minor leaks or catalytic converter efficiency loss, which could go unnoticed without a diagnostic scan. Structural corrosion, particularly around wheel arches and sills, should be inspected, as this is often overlooked in low-mileage vehicles but can compromise structural integrity over time. Tyre tread depth and condition, while not MOT-failed here, warrant verification, as the record does not confirm whether previous tests flagged wear beyond the legal limit.