2025 Ford Puma ST-Line X Mhev Hybrid electric (clean) · KX25 RRO

As a 2025 Ford Puma ST-Line X MHEV, the defining mechanical story here is essentially an unwritten one, given that no MOT test has yet been recorded against this vehicle. The Puma is a relatively new model on the road, and vehicles in the UK typically only require their first MOT test once they reach three years of age, which means this car has not yet crossed that statutory threshold. Without any DVSA-recorded test outcomes, advisories, or failure points, there is no historical pattern of component wear, corrosion, brake degradation, or suspension deterioration to draw upon from the official record. This places the burden of evaluation entirely on a physical inspection, as the MOT file currently offers no insight into how the vehicle has performed under standardised roadworthiness scrutiny. With no recorded mileage figures supplied and no MOT tests on file, it is not possible to calculate an annual mileage accumulation rate or identify any unusual usage pattern or gaps in testing. The absence of mileage data means there is no objective benchmark against which to gauge whether the vehicle has been driven sparingly on short urban journeys, used predominantly for higher-speed motorway commuting, or subjected to the kind of stop-start duty cycle that places additional thermal stress on braking components and clutches. For an MHEV mild-hybrid powertrain such as this, the lack of mileage context is particularly relevant because belt-driven starter-generator systems and 48V mild-hybrid architecture components can behave differently depending on usage profile, but the available records offer nothing concrete on which to base that judgement. For a prospective buyer evaluating this Puma without any MOT history to lean on, the inspection must instead be grounded in the known engineering characteristics of the model and the components most commonly flagged on early Puma test records. Particular attention should be paid to the front suspension, specifically the lower control arms, anti-roll bar bushes, and the drop links, as these have been a known weak point on Puma models and can produce clonking noises over speed humps and uneven surfaces long before they generate any visible wear at the wheel. On a test drive, listen for any knocking or rattling from the front end over rough roads, and feel for vagueness or imprecise turn-in response, which can indicate premature bush deterioration. Brake feel should also be examined closely, with any pulling to one side under firm pedal pressure, judder through the pedal, or binding at low-speed manoeuvres suggesting caliper or disc issues that an MOT might not yet have caught. Closer inspection should also cover the underside of the vehicle, with the rear subframe mounting areas, brake pipes, and fuel lines checked for early signs of surface corrosion or stone-chip damage that can progress rapidly on lower-spec chassis components. The exhaust system, particularly the flexible joints and mounting rubbers, should be checked for signs of leaks or sagging, and the tyres should be examined for uneven shoulder wear, which on the Puma can often point to geometry issues stemming from worn rear suspension bushes. Given the MHEV powertrain, it is also worth confirming that the 12V auxiliary battery and the mild-hybrid system's warning indicators behave as expected on start-up, and that no dashboard warning lights relating to the hybrid system remain illuminated after the initial bulb check. Because no MOT data exists to verify any of these systems, a comprehensive pre-purchase inspection by a qualified technician is strongly advisable before committing to the purchase.