2001 Toyota RAV4 2.0L Petrol · LB51 CKN

The most recent MOT history for this 2001 Toyota RAV4 reveals a concerning pattern of inconsistent testing and unresolved issues, particularly in the final 12 months. The vehicle failed twice in February 2026—just four days apart—despite identical mileage, yet no defects were recorded on either occasion. This suggests either administrative errors in the MOT process or, more critically, that the tester may have overlooked critical failures. The December 2024 failure at 134,305 miles, followed by a passed test in December 2023 at 129,163 miles, indicates a recurring problem that was not addressed between tests. The lack of documented defects in these failures is particularly troubling, as it implies either a failure to report serious issues or a pattern of deferred maintenance. The vehicle’s roadworthiness cannot be confidently assessed without clarification on what was actually tested and why the failures were not resolved. The recorded mileage of 134,723 miles over 25 years—approximately 5,389 miles annually—is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, suggesting either minimal use or prolonged periods of inactivity. The gap between the December 2023 tests (129,163 miles) and the December 2024 failure (134,305 miles) represents just 5,142 miles in a year, followed by another 418 miles before the February 2026 failures. This suggests the vehicle was not driven regularly enough to warrant frequent MOT testing, yet the lack of progress in addressing failures raises questions about whether the owner prioritised maintenance. The low mileage could also indicate deferred servicing, as critical components like suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers may have deteriorated without the wear associated with higher mileage. Given the repeated failures without documented defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, brakes, and structural integrity. The repeated failures imply a high likelihood of unresolved issues such as worn suspension bushes, binding calipers, or corrosion in critical areas. The absence of advisories in the MOT record does not guarantee these components are sound—it may simply reflect a tester’s failure to identify them. Particular attention should be given to the rear brakes, which are often overlooked in older vehicles, and the chassis for signs of rust penetration, especially around wheel arches and sills. The exhaust system should also be checked for leaks or excessive corrosion, as this is a common failure point in vehicles of this age. Without a clear explanation for the repeated failures, the vehicle’s long-term reliability remains uncertain.