2004 Renault Clio 1.4L Petrol · LB54 ACX

The most recent MOT history for this Renault Clio reveals a concerning pattern of repeated failures just days before passing tests, with the last failure recorded on 2025-09-29 and the subsequent pass on 2025-10-01 at identical mileage. This suggests either a deliberate manipulation of test dates or a vehicle that consistently borders on failure, particularly in areas not captured in the official record. The absence of recorded defects in any test—even the failures—implies the tester may have overlooked critical issues, or the vehicle passed minor thresholds while still harbouring latent problems. The lack of advisories or recurring faults in the system is unusual for a vehicle of this age, but the abrupt failures warrant skepticism about whether the car has been properly maintained between tests. The recorded mileage of 62,466 miles over 22 years equates to approximately 2,839 miles annually, which is unusually low for a car of this vintage. The gaps between tests—particularly the identical mileage at failure and pass in consecutive years—suggest periods of inactivity rather than consistent use. The 2024 test cycle shows no mileage progression between the failure and pass, reinforcing the suspicion of irregular testing patterns. While low mileage can indicate lighter use, the abrupt failures and lack of progress between tests raise questions about whether the vehicle has been stored improperly or whether critical components have deteriorated without proper attention. Given the repeated failures without recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of suspension components, including coil springs, bushes, and shock absorbers, as these are common areas for gradual degradation that might not be immediately obvious. The brakes, particularly the rear system, should be thoroughly checked for binding calipers or uneven wear, as the failures may have stemmed from undetected brake issues. Structural integrity, especially around wheel arches and sills, should also be examined for corrosion, as rust can compromise safety-critical elements without being flagged in an MOT. The absence of advisories in the record does not guarantee these areas are sound, so a detailed mechanical assessment is essential.