2014 Citroen Nemo 1.2L Diesel · LC14 UGM

The Citroën Nemo’s most recent MOT test on 2025-11-12 confirms it passed without defects, though it was retested just two days earlier after a failure at 209,287 miles. This pattern of consecutive tests suggests a rushed or reactive approach to compliance rather than proactive maintenance. The absence of recorded defects across all five MOTs—spanning over 35,000 miles—implies no repeated mechanical failures, but the repeated November testing indicates a lack of consistency in servicing. The vehicle’s structural integrity and major systems appear to have passed inspection, yet the high mileage and irregular retesting warrant closer scrutiny of wear items and underlying conditions. The recorded mileage of 209,361 miles over roughly 12 years equates to an average of 17,447 miles annually, which is unusually high for a vehicle of this age. Between the 2022 and 2023 tests, mileage jumped by 17,800 miles in just under a year, suggesting either intensive use or prolonged periods without maintenance. The gap between the 2024 and 2025 tests—covering 18,569 miles in under a year—reinforces this trend. Such rapid accumulation increases the likelihood of accelerated wear on suspension components, brake systems, and drivetrain elements, particularly if servicing was deferred. Given the lack of recorded defects, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should centre on high-wear items that are not routinely checked during MOTs. The suspension—particularly coil springs, bushes, and dampers—should be examined for uneven sagging or excessive play, as high mileage often compromises these components. Brake discs and calipers, especially rear, may show uneven wear or binding, despite passing tests; measure pad thickness and check for lateral wear patterns. Corrosion around wheel arches, sills, and subframes is critical, given the vehicle’s age, as hidden rust can compromise structural integrity. Finally, verify the condition of the exhaust system for leaks or excessive sag, as emissions systems are not always thoroughly inspected during MOTs. The absence of advisories in the record does not guarantee these areas are sound.