2011 Nissan Note 1.4L Petrol · LM11 CFV

The most recent MOT test on the 2011 Nissan Note was conducted on 2026-01-12, resulting in a clean pass with no defects recorded. This follows a pattern of consistent MOT outcomes over the past five years, with only minor advisories noted in previous tests. The absence of failures and the limited presence of advisories—particularly those that have not recurred or escalated—suggest a generally stable maintenance trend. However, the presence of recurring advisories on the front brake discs and offside tyre wear indicates a need for closer attention to these components, as they may reflect underlying wear patterns or potential future issues if not addressed promptly. The fact that the vehicle passed the latest test does not absolve the owner of proactive checks, especially given the vehicle’s age and accumulated mileage. The vehicle’s recorded mileage of 104,512 miles for a 15-year-old model represents a moderate annual usage rate of approximately 6,967 miles per year, which is within the expected range for its age. This level of mileage is unlikely to have caused catastrophic wear beyond what the advisories suggest, but it does warrant consideration of how the vehicle has been driven—particularly in terms of load, terrain, and driving style—which can accelerate component wear. The absence of significant mileage gaps suggests the vehicle has been in regular use, but the presence of advisories on the front anti-roll bar ball joint and oil leak could indicate prolonged exposure to stress or neglect in specific systems. The offside tyre wear close to the legal limit and the previous failed MOT with dangerous tyre defects highlight the importance of monitoring tyre condition, as underinflation or uneven wear can exacerbate other issues like suspension or alignment problems. For the prospective buyer, the most critical areas to inspect are the front brake system and tyre condition. The advisories on the worn, pitted brake discs—both near and offside—should prompt a thorough examination of brake pad thickness, disc warping, and the condition of brake fluid for signs of contamination or moisture, which can lead to brake failure. Listen for uneven braking performance, a grinding or squealing noise during deceleration, or a spongy pedal feel, as these could indicate disc warping, binding calipers, or worn brake pads. Additionally, check for brake fluid leaks under the vehicle, as this may correlate with the oil leak advisory. During a test drive, observe the vehicle’s handling for any clunking or rattling noises from the suspension, particularly when driving over bumps, which may suggest the offside front anti-roll bar ball joint play noted in previous MOTs. Inspect the oil leak area for any signs of fluid pooling or discoloration, and consider having the oil changed if it appears old or contaminated, as oil degradation can accelerate wear on bearings and seals. Beyond the advisories, the buyer should conduct a comprehensive physical inspection of the vehicle’s structural and fluid integrity. Given the vehicle’s age, check the tyre sidewalls for signs of perishing or cracking, which can compromise tyre safety and may require replacement even if tread depth is legal. Inspect the battery terminals for corrosion and ensure the 12V system is functioning correctly, as a failing battery can lead to electrical gremlins and poor starting performance. Verify that all fluids—oil, coolant, brake fluid, and transmission fluid—are topped up and free from contamination, as time-based degradation can lead to catastrophic failures. If the vehicle has been stored for extended periods, check for standing corrosion on the undercarriage, particularly around wheel arches, exhaust components, and the fuel tank, as prolonged exposure to moisture can cause rust to spread. Finally, review the service history for the timing of oil changes, brake servicing, and suspension inspections, as a well-documented service schedule can mitigate some of the wear-related advisories noted in the MOT history.