2012 Toyota RAV4 2.2L Diesel · LM53 AMS

The vehicle’s most recent MOT test on 2025-05-31 confirms it remains roadworthy, with no defects or advisories recorded. This clean history across five tests—spanning from 2023 to 2025—indicates a stable maintenance pattern, though the duplicate entry for 2024-06-26 (a failed test followed by an immediate retest) suggests a brief oversight rather than a systemic issue. The absence of recurring advisories or major failures implies the vehicle has not undergone significant mechanical neglect, but the lack of any warnings also means no prior issues were formally documented. Buyers should note that the most recent test was conducted over a year ago, which is beyond the standard 12-month MOT validity period, and a fresh inspection would be prudent. The recorded mileage of 61,833 miles over approximately 14 years equates to roughly 4,417 miles annually, a figure well below the average for a vehicle of this age. This low mileage could indicate limited use, extended periods of storage, or a combination of both. There are no obvious gaps in the MOT history that would suggest prolonged neglect, as tests occur at roughly annual intervals without irregular delays. However, the low mileage does not necessarily correlate with reduced wear on critical components like suspension bushes or brake calipers, which degrade over time regardless of distance travelled. The lack of advisories on corrosion or structural integrity in prior tests is reassuring, but a visual inspection of wheel arches, sills, and underbody would still be essential. Given the clean MOT record, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should centre on suspension components—particularly rear suspension bushes and coil springs—which are common points of failure in vehicles of this age and mileage. The absence of advisories does not preclude wear; binding rear brakes were not flagged in any test, but a thorough check of brake pads, discs, and caliper pistons is advisable, especially if the vehicle has spent time stationary. Exhaust emissions were not mentioned in any test, but a visual inspection for leaks or excessive soot around the catalytic converter would be prudent. Finally, the tyres have not been noted in the MOT history, so verifying tread depth, uneven wear, and sidewall integrity is critical, as failing twice on tyre tread in prior tests would suggest basic upkeep was overlooked.