2012 Ford Mondeo 2.0L Diesel · LP62 BWW

This 2012 Ford Mondeo has maintained a clean MOT history with no defects or advisories recorded across the last five annual tests, most recently passing on 11 June 2025 at 106,976 miles. The absence of any recurring issues suggests the vehicle has been subject to consistent, if not rigorous, maintenance—though the lack of advisories also implies that any minor wear or potential problems may not have been addressed proactively. The most recent test, just over a year ago, aligns with the standard three-year MOT interval, meaning the vehicle has not yet been re-tested since then. While this indicates no immediate mechanical failures, the gap between the last MOT and today’s date (over a year) means some components—particularly brakes, suspension, and emissions systems—could now be approaching their typical replacement thresholds without confirmation. The mileage progression of approximately 7,641 miles annually over the past four years reflects typical usage for a vehicle of this age, without any abrupt spikes or prolonged periods of inactivity. The intervals between tests are consistent, with roughly 4,800 to 5,000 miles accumulated between each MOT, suggesting the car has been driven regularly rather than stored. There are no red flags in the mileage pattern itself, though the steady accumulation implies that high-wear items like tyres, brake pads, and suspension bushes will have experienced significant use. The lack of advisories in prior tests also means there’s no historical evidence of neglect, but it does not preclude the need for a thorough inspection of components that degrade predictably over time. Given the clean MOT record, a buyer should prioritise an in-person inspection of the suspension system, particularly the condition of the rear coil springs and bushes, as these are common points of failure in this model at this mileage. The brakes, though not flagged in prior tests, should be checked for uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle has been driven through wet or heavy loads. Exhaust emissions systems, while not previously noted, may now require attention if the car has been driven in urban areas with high congestion. Structural integrity should also be assessed for corrosion around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as these areas are prone to rust in a vehicle of this age. The absence of advisories in past tests does not guarantee current compliance, so a focus on these high-wear and high-risk areas is essential.