2018 Nissan Juke 1.2L Petrol · LS18 MGE

This 2018 Nissan Juke has maintained a consistent MOT history with no defects recorded across five consecutive tests, most recently passing on 30 June 2025 at 56,275 miles. The absence of advisories or failures suggests the vehicle has undergone regular, if not meticulous, servicing, though the record does not provide service intervals or specific maintenance details. The most recent test, just over a year ago, aligns with the legal requirement, but given the vehicle’s age and mileage, a pre-purchase inspection remains essential to verify the condition of high-wear components not always captured in MOT testing. The recorded mileage of 56,275 miles over eight years equates to approximately 7,000 miles annually, a rate that aligns with typical usage patterns for this model. There are no unusual gaps or spikes in mileage between tests, with each annual interval averaging around 10,000 miles. The July 2021 test at 20,694 miles stands out as the only deviation from the June-June cycle, but this does not indicate neglect—rather, it reflects a minor scheduling variation without adverse implications. The lack of advisories or repeated failures in the MOT history implies that previous owners have likely addressed basic maintenance, such as tyre rotations and brake inspections, though this cannot be confirmed without service records. Given the clean MOT record, a buyer should prioritise an inspection of suspension components, particularly the front and rear bushes and coil springs, as these are common wear items not always flagged in a standard test. The brakes, while not explicitly failed, should be assessed for uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle has experienced aggressive stopping or off-road use. Corrosion, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, warrants close examination, as this model is prone to rust in wet conditions. Finally, the exhaust system should be checked for leaks or excessive corrosion, as emissions-related failures are not always recorded in the MOT history. The absence of advisories does not guarantee these areas are flawless, but they represent the most likely candidates for hidden deterioration.