IsItAGoodCar
Official DVLA Record

2009 Fiat 500 1.2L Petrol · ML58 WXB

ML58 WXB

2009 Fiat 500 (1.2L, petrol). First registered 09 Jan 2009. Recorded mileage 100,401 miles. MOT expired on 12 Sept 2024.

Make & Model
FIAT 500
Year / Origin
2009 · Manchester & Merseyside
Safety Recall
Unknown
MOT Status
Expired on 12 Sept 2024
Road Tax
—
Recorded Mileage
100,401 mi
ULEZ Compliance
ULEZ Compliant (Euro 4+)
Fuel & Engine
Petrol · 1.2L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Expired
Expired on 12 Sept 2024
Tax Status
Check Tax
Click to check rates
Fuel Type
Petrol
Year
2009
Engine
1242cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

A pattern of recurrent chassis and braking failures defines the 2009 FIAT 500's roadworthiness history, with the most recent September 2023 MOT passing only after addressing persistent rear coil spring corrosion, oil misting within the front suspension system, and ongoing deterioration of the rear subframe and front suspension arm bushings. Despite this final clearance, the record shows a troubling oscillation between passes and failures spanning seven years, indicating that underlying structural weaknesses have resurfaced rather than been resolved. The latest test result confirms that while the vehicle cleared the MOT standard, it carries multiple active advisories that point to systemic reliability concerns rather than isolated incidents, suggesting the car has accumulated cumulative damage that may not yet be reflected in its current certificate. The mileage figure of 100,401 miles for a seventeen-year-old vehicle translates to approximately 5,906 miles per year, which appears lower than expected for a car of this age and raises questions about the typical wear patterns associated with such driving distances. This unusually low odometer reading could indicate extended periods of storage or infrequent use, but it does not necessarily align with the severity of the reported defects. The gap between the August 2023 failed test and the subsequent September 2023 successful MOT is merely twenty-eight days, suggesting that the vehicle remained under scrutiny for just one month before clearing, yet the continued presence of rear subframe corrosion and front suspension issues implies that the underlying degradation has progressed independently of the immediate test cycle. Such a discrepancy between low recorded mileage and widespread mechanical advisories warrants particular attention when evaluating long-term reliability. Focused examination of the documented failures reveals three critical areas requiring immediate investigation during a test drive. The rear coil springs have shown consistent corrosion on both sides across two separate MOTs, and their continued presence alongside new oil misting in the front side-shock absorbers indicates potential hydraulic system contamination that could compromise braking performance and handling stability. The rear subframe has suffered corrosive damage throughout its history, with the 2023 record noting it remains "not seriously weakened" despite the extensive rust noted previously, meaning structural integrity is compromised enough to risk progressive failure. Additionally, the front suspension arm ball joints have exhibited varying degrees of wear and play across multiple assessments, and the front suspension arm pins or bushings have shown signs of fatigue that could manifest as knocking noises over bumps or loss of control during corners. For a prospective buyer, the most pressing mechanical checks should centre on the rear coil spring assembly and the front suspension linkages, as these directly impact safety-critical functions. When testing drive, listen for any metallic knocks or clunks over speed bumps, particularly through the rear axle, since corroded coil springs can transmit vibrations and lose load-bearing capacity. Inspect the front suspension arms for visible play at the ball joints by gently wiggling them while the vehicle is moving; excessive movement here would confirm the wear noted in the 2021 and 2022 MOT reports. The rear subframe should be examined for any structural flexing or cracks, especially around the rear wheel arches where corrosion has been documented repeatedly. Finally, verify the condition of the front brake discs and pipes, as historical failures included imbalance and missing support clamps, and ensure the front headlamps are securely mounted and properly aligned, since the 2021 and 2022 records highlighted multiple headlamp security concerns that could affect night-time visibility and lighting consistency. While the September 2023 MOT granted clearance, the persistence of these specific failures means the vehicle requires thorough physical verification before committing to purchase.

ML58 WXB Key Findings

  • 4 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 14/09/2023
  • 100,401 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 2 historical MOT failures
  • 7 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring suspension items (12 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
45
/ 100 · Below Average
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Below Average

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
! Average MOT pass rate (50%)
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for ML58WXB

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Finance
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Write-off
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Salvage
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Imported
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Exported
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Scrapped
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
Destruction
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
V5C Logbook
UNVERIFIED
Unlock to verify
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

ULEZ Compliant

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

ML58 WXB Mileage History

  1. 15/08/202299,225 mi
  2. 18/08/202299,225 mi
  3. 22/08/2023100,401 mi+1,176 mi
  4. 14/09/2023100,401 mi

Average of roughly 1,088 miles per year across 4 recorded odometer readings.

ML58 WXB MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 12 Sept 2026, 11:46
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

4 MOT tests are recorded for this 2009 Fiat 500 (ML58 WXB) between August 2022 and September 2023.

The record contains 2 passes and 2 failures.

The most recent test on 14 September 2023 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 2 failures that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Suspension (12 issues), Lighting (6 issues), Brakes (4 issues), Windscreen (1 issue), Exhaust & Emissions (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 21 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Offside Front Driver's door cannot be opened from outside the vehicle (6.2.3 (a))”; “Offside Front Headlamp insecure (4.1.1 (c))”; “Nearside Front Headlamp insecure (4.1.1 (c))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY