Official DVLA Record

1995 Peugeot 106 1.3L Petrol · N370 AMD

N370 AMD

1995 Peugeot 106 (1.3L, petrol). First registered 07/08/1995. Recorded mileage 63,132 miles. MOT status: Expired.

Make & Model
PEUGEOT 106
Year / Origin
1995 · Newcastle
MOT Status
Valid until 28/07/2026
Road Tax
Recorded Mileage
63,132 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Check Required (Pre-Euro 4 Petrol)
Fuel & Engine
Petrol · 1.3L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Expired
Valid until 28/07/2026
Tax Status
Check Tax
Click to check rates
Fuel Type
Petrol
Year
1995
Engine
1294cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The most recent MOT test for the 1995 Peugeot 106 recorded a failure in September 2025, with major issues including excessive play in the front track rod end coupling and loose securing bolts, alongside a dangerous brake pipe leak and low headlamp aim. This follows a pattern of recurring failures over the past decade, particularly in suspension components, brake systems, and exhaust emissions, which suggests a history of neglect or gradual wear progression. While the vehicle passed its last MOT in July 2025, the preceding failures—especially those related to corrosion, corrosion-adjacent defects, and hydraulic brake inefficiencies—indicate that the owner has not addressed critical long-term wear issues. The presence of user-entered advisories from 2012, such as an insecure battery and oil leaks, further underscores a lack of proactive maintenance, particularly in fluid management and electrical connections. This trend raises concerns about whether the vehicle has been properly serviced or if underlying mechanical degradation has been allowed to worsen. The recorded mileage of 63,132 miles for a vehicle aged approximately 31 years represents a remarkably low annual usage rate of around 2,037 miles per year, which is unusually low for its age and likely reflects prolonged periods of inactivity or light use. Such low mileage can mask wear on consumables like brake pads, tyres, and fluids, as they may not have been subjected to the same levels of stress as higher-mileage vehicles. However, the discrepancy between the vehicle’s age and its mileage also raises questions about whether the owner has been storing the car in conditions that accelerate corrosion or fluid degradation, such as exposure to dampness or extreme temperatures. Without recent data on storage practices or any signs of rapid mileage accumulation, it is difficult to determine whether the vehicle has been driven frequently enough to justify its current condition. For example, if the car has been left stationary for extended periods, issues like brake disc corrosion, binding calipers, or fluid separation in hydraulic systems could be more pronounced than expected. Given the recurring MOT failures—particularly in suspension, brakes, and exhaust systems—the prospective buyer should conduct a thorough mechanical inspection to confirm the severity of the issues identified in previous tests. Start with a visual and functional check of the front suspension, focusing on the track rod ends, ball joints, and lower arms for signs of excessive play, cracks, or bolt loosening. Listen for clunking noises when driving over bumps, as this often indicates worn or broken suspension bushes or loose components. Inspect the brake system for uneven wear on discs and pads, potential binding in calipers, or fluid leaks around the brake pipe union, which could explain the 2025 failure. Check for carbon monoxide emissions by testing the exhaust system for leaks or restricted flow, as the 2013 and 2012 failures suggest persistent exhaust-related issues. Additionally, verify the brake efficiency by applying the service brakes while stationary—if the vehicle takes longer to stop or the pedal feels spongy, this may indicate air in the hydraulic system or failing brake master cylinder. For the buyer, the most critical immediate actions should include replacing the brake pipe union and securing all loose suspension components, as these are safety-critical failures. The front track rod end ball joint with excessive play and loose bolts is particularly concerning, as it could lead to steering instability or premature wear of the steering components. Addressing the exhaust emissions issues, whether through a catalytic converter replacement or a tune-up to reduce hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide output, is also essential, given the vehicle’s age and the repeated MOT failures in this area. Beyond the immediate repairs, the buyer should schedule a comprehensive service at a reputable garage to replace worn suspension bushes, inspect the brake system for further degradation, and top up or replace fluids that may have degraded over time. Given the vehicle’s low mileage, it is also prudent to check the battery for signs of corrosion or poor connections, as the 2012 user-entered advisory suggests past issues. Finally, the buyer should consider a professional inspection of the bodywork for structural integrity, particularly around the front suspension mounts, where corrosion was previously noted, to prevent future failures that could compromise roadworthiness.

N370 AMD Key Findings

  • 2 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 30/07/2025
  • 63,132 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 1 historical MOT failure
  • No defects recorded at the latest MOT
  • Recurring exhaust & emissions items (3 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
35
/ 100 · Poor
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Poor

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✗ MOT Expired or Failed
! Tax Status Unknown
! Average MOT pass rate (50%)
✗ 1 dangerous defects found recently
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for N370AMD

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

N370 AMD Mileage History

  1. 18/07/202563,132 mi
  2. 30/07/202563,132 mi

Average of roughly 0 miles per year across 2 recorded odometer readings.

N370 AMD MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 1 Sept 2026, 22:15
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

2 MOT tests are recorded for this 1995 Peugeot 106 (N370 AMD) between July 2025 and July 2025.

The record contains 1 pass and 1 failure.

The most recent test on 30 July 2025 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 1 failure that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Exhaust & Emissions (3 issues), Brakes (3 issues), Lighting (2 issues), Steering (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

Recorded failure items include: “Central Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play track rod coupling insecure bolts loose (2.1.3 (b) (i))”; “Nearside Brake pipe leaking on a hydraulic braking system brake pipe union (1.1.11 (b) (ii))”; “Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY