2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.2L Diesel · N555 ACP

The most recent MOT test on 2026-07-27 reveals a concerning inconsistency in the vehicle’s roadworthiness status, as the May 2025 tests—just 12 months apart—both recorded a pass and a failure at the same mileage of 114,203. This duplication suggests either an administrative error or, more critically, that the vehicle was not tested in the intervening period, leaving its condition unchecked for nearly a year. The previous cycle in May 2024 similarly showed two tests at 104,861 miles, reinforcing a pattern of either irregular or incomplete MOT compliance. While the 2023 test at 96,259 miles passed without defects, the lack of intermediate testing means no oversight of wear progression between May 2023 and May 2024. The absence of advisories or defects in the available records does not guarantee current reliability, as critical components may have deteriorated without inspection. The recorded mileage of 114,203 miles over approximately 11 years equates to an average of around 10,382 miles annually, which aligns with typical usage for this age of vehicle. However, the gaps between tests—particularly the near-year-long period between May 2024 and May 2025—raise questions about whether the vehicle was driven consistently or stood unused for extended periods. If the latter, components like suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers could have degraded more rapidly due to lack of movement, while tyres might exhibit uneven wear from prolonged static loading. The absence of mileage increments between tests also obscures whether the vehicle was maintained regularly or if critical services were deferred. Given the irregular MOT history, a prospective buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of high-wear items that often fail silently, such as the suspension system—particularly the rear coil springs and bushes, which are prone to fatigue at this mileage. The braking system warrants thorough examination for uneven disc wear, binding calipers, or corrosion in the rear, as the duplicated tests suggest potential oversight of these critical safety components. Structural integrity should also be assessed for signs of corrosion, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as these areas are susceptible to hidden deterioration over 11 years. The lack of advisories in past tests does not preclude these issues, so visual and functional checks are essential to confirm the vehicle’s current condition.