2012 Mazda 2 1.3L Petrol · NL12 AEB

The vehicle’s most recent MOT test on 2025-11-28 at 63,377 miles confirms it remains roadworthy, with no defects or advisories recorded across five consecutive annual tests. This consistency suggests a stable maintenance history, though the absence of any warnings—even minor—does not preclude hidden wear. The last test was conducted just six months ago, placing it well within the optimal window for assessing current condition. No recurring faults have been logged, which is unusual given the vehicle’s age, though this could simply reflect diligent servicing or a model known for reliability. The recorded mileage of 63,377 miles over 14 years—approximately 4,527 miles annually—indicates unusually light usage for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps between tests, with mileage increments averaging around 750 miles per year, suggesting either regular, low-mileage operation or prolonged periods of storage. The most notable mileage jump occurred between 2021-11-13 (59,056 miles) and 2022-11-09 (60,874 miles), a span of just 1,818 miles over 11 months, which could imply the vehicle was stationary for part of that period. While this pattern reduces wear on high-mileage components, it also raises questions about fluid changes, tyre rotation, and general upkeep during inactive periods. Given the lack of MOT advisories, the primary focus for an in-person inspection should centre on components prone to deferred maintenance in low-mileage vehicles: suspension bushes and coil springs, which may stiffen or crack over time despite minimal use. The brakes—particularly rear calipers—should be checked for binding or excessive wear, as binding was not flagged in any test but can develop silently. Exhaust emissions were not tested beyond the pass/fail threshold, so a visual inspection for leaks or corrosion in the catalytic converter or oxygen sensors is advisable. Structural integrity, especially around wheel arches and sills, warrants scrutiny for corrosion, as rust can accelerate in vehicles left stationary for extended periods. Tyre tread depth, despite no recorded failures, should be verified, as failing twice on this criterion in other vehicles suggests basic upkeep may have been overlooked.