2012 Nissan Juke 1.5L Diesel · OJ04 ANE

A recurring theme of corrosion and progressive wear on the braking and suspension assemblies defines this 2012 Nissan Juke, although the October 2025 MOT recorded a clean pass with no defects noted. Earlier tests reveal a pattern of brake disc wear advisories on all four wheels, thin front pads, and repeated anti‑roll‑bar and suspension‑arm bush wear, alongside major corrosion findings on the rear axle, front sub‑frame and rear brake pipe. The vehicle also suffered a horn failure and registration‑lamp faults in 2024, but those issues have since been rectified. At 130,711 mi the mileage averages roughly 9,300 mi per year, which sits comfortably within normal usage for a fourteen‑year‑old model. The MOT record shows annual testing without significant gaps, indicating the odometer readings are likely reliable and the car has not experienced prolonged storage periods that could exacerbate rust or component decay. This steady accumulation suggests wear on consumables will be in line with age‑related expectations, but the documented corrosion on structural elements warrants particular attention. When inspecting the car, focus first on the braking system: listen for squeal or grinding that could signal disc thinning beyond advisory levels, feel for pedal pulsation or a spongy feel that may indicate worn pads or a compromised brake pipe. Examine the front anti‑roll‑bar links and off‑side suspension arm bushes for excessive play or knocking over bumps, as previous advisories highlighted ball‑joint and pin wear. Check the rear axle and front sub‑frame for surface rust, especially around mounting points, and look for any signs of fluid leakage from the rear brake pipe, which was previously deemed excessively corroded. Verify that the horn operates sharply and that both registration‑lamp clusters illuminate correctly, as these were recent failure points. Given the history, budgeting for replacement of the brake discs and pads on all corners, renewal of the anti‑roll‑bar linkage bushings, and a thorough corrosion remediation on the rear axle and front sub‑frame would be prudent. A qualified mechanic should also inspect the rear brake pipe for thinning or perforation and confirm the parking‑brake mechanism meets efficiency standards, as past failures indicated reduced performance. A test drive that includes firm braking, gentle cornering, and a low‑speed lane change will help reveal any steering pull, uneven braking, or suspension noises that may not have been captured during the MOT.