2020 Renault Kadjar 1.3L Petrol · PL69 AAY

The Renault Kadjar’s MOT history presents a stable but inconsistent picture of roadworthiness, with only two minor faults recorded in the last two tests—both relating to lighting and fluid delivery systems rather than mechanical or structural integrity. The most recent double-test in May 2026 at 45,051 miles revealed a straightforward failure: the offside headlamp was incorrectly aimed, and the windscreen washer jets were misaligned or blocked. Neither issue suggests underlying mechanical neglect, though the repeated test on the same day implies the tester initially overlooked the washer jet problem. Prior to this, the vehicle passed three consecutive MOTs without defects, including the 2024 test where underside guards were noted—likely an aftermarket addition to address minor corrosion or stone chipping. The absence of advisories or major defects in the past three years indicates that core systems (brakes, suspension, emissions, and structure) have been maintained at a functional level, though the lighting faults hint at either a lack of attention to detail or a previous owner who prioritised mobility over minor adjustments. The Kadjar’s mileage accumulation—averaging around 7,500 miles per year—aligns with typical usage for its age, suggesting it has not been subjected to excessive wear from high annual distances. The recorded mileages (13,052 in May 2023, 24,189 in May 2024, 35,223 in May 2025, and 45,051 in May 2026) show a steady, linear progression without sudden spikes or prolonged inactivity, which would otherwise raise concerns about suspension wear, brake binding, or seized components. The consistency in mileage also reduces the likelihood of hidden corrosion or fatigue in high-stress areas, though the underside guards fitted in 2024 may indicate prior concerns about stone damage or light surface rust—something a buyer should verify in person. For a prospective purchaser, the primary focus should be on verifying the resolution of the 2026 lighting faults, as these could recur if not properly adjusted or if the washer jets were merely cleared rather than repaired. Beyond that, the lack of advisories or defects in structural components (such as suspension bushes, coil springs, or binding calipers) or braking systems suggests no immediate red flags, but a thorough inspection of the underside for corrosion—particularly around wheel arches, exhaust mounts, and subframe—is advisable. Given the 2024 note about underside guards, check for any signs of past corrosion repair or uneven rust penetration, as this could indicate prior neglect. Tyre condition should also be confirmed, as the MOT does not cover tread depth beyond the test date, and the absence of tyre-related advisories in recent tests implies they were compliant at the time but may now require replacement. Finally, a test drive to assess braking responsiveness, steering feel, and any unusual noises would be prudent, given the vehicle’s age and the lack of recorded advisories on suspension or drivetrain components.