2018 Skoda Citigo 1.0L Petrol · PX68 PWJ

The 2018 Škoda Citigo has maintained a clean MOT history with no defects or advisories recorded across five consecutive tests, most recently passing on 13 August 2025 at 22,390 miles. This consistency suggests the vehicle has been subjected to either diligent maintenance or minimal stress, as no recurring issues have been flagged by DVSA testers. The absence of advisories—particularly for critical components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or binding calipers—implies no obvious mechanical degradation has gone unaddressed. However, the 2025 test occurred just over a year ago, meaning the vehicle has not undergone a formal inspection since. While this is within the legal window, buyers should verify whether interim servicing has been conducted, especially given the low mileage accumulation. The recorded mileage of 22,390 miles over eight years—approximately 2,800 miles annually—is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, indicating either very light use or prolonged periods of inactivity. The gaps between tests are consistent, with roughly 2,000 miles logged between each MOT, which could reflect either careful ownership or extended storage. Notably, there are no advisories or partial passes suggesting intermittent neglect, but the static nature of the record raises questions about whether the vehicle has been driven regularly enough to prevent issues like flat-spotted tyres, stiff suspension joints, or degraded fuel system components. The lack of higher mileage intervals also means some wear items—such as brake pads, timing belt (if applicable), or cabin filters—may not have been replaced at manufacturer-recommended intervals. Given the clean MOT record, a buyer’s primary focus should be verifying the condition of high-wear consumables that aren’t routinely inspected during an MOT. Tyres, despite no recorded defects, should be checked for uneven wear, which could indicate alignment issues or prolonged storage. The brakes—never flagged—should be inspected for uneven pad thickness or glazing, while discs should be examined for lateral run-out or excessive corrosion. The suspension, though never advised, warrants scrutiny for perished bushes, cracked coil springs, or binding joints, particularly if the vehicle has spent extended periods stationary. Additionally, the exhaust system should be probed for leaks or corrosion, especially around flanges, while the underbody should be inspected for signs of structural rust, particularly around wheel arches and sills, given the vehicle’s age. The absence of advisories in the MOT history is reassuring, but the low mileage and static record necessitate a thorough inspection of items not covered by the test. Buyers should prioritise confirming whether the vehicle has been serviced according to the manufacturer’s schedule, as some critical components—such as the timing belt (if fitted), fuel injectors, or transmission fluid—may not have been serviced within the recommended intervals. A pre-purchase inspection by a qualified mechanic is strongly advised to confirm the vehicle’s true condition beyond the MOT’s scope.