2010 Audi Q5 2.0L Diesel · R3 TMM

The Audi Q5’s MOT history reflects a vehicle that has largely passed its tests in recent years, though with a clear pattern of recurring issues that suggest inconsistent maintenance. The most recent test in September 2025 at 157,597 miles passed without defects, indicating the current state is mechanically sound at this moment. However, the trend prior to that shows a vehicle that has been managed reactively rather than proactively—front brake discs were flagged as worn and pitted in 2024, while suspension arm bushes and tyre wear were persistent problems in 2023. The failure in August 2023 for headlamp function, parking brake inefficiency, and tyre condition underscores a lapse in basic upkeep, though these were rectified before the next test. The sub-frame corrosion noted in 2024, while not yet structurally critical, is a concern that should be monitored closely, as rust in this area can escalate with further exposure to moisture. Mileage accumulation has been steady and typical for a 16-year-old vehicle, averaging around 9,850 miles per year, which aligns with moderate use. The gaps between tests are standard—annual checks with no major spikes in mileage suggest the car hasn’t been driven excessively hard, though the August 2023 failure just days before the September test implies some urgency in addressing issues rather than planned maintenance. The mileage increments between tests (e.g., 5,658 miles between September 2024 and 2025) confirm regular but not aggressive usage, which may explain why more severe wear hasn’t yet manifested. For a buyer, the priority should be a thorough inspection of the front brake system, particularly the discs and pads, given their repeated flagging. Binding or uneven wear on the discs could indicate misalignment or caliper issues, while thin pads may require imminent replacement. The suspension arm bushes, though not yet failing, should be checked for excessive play or hardening, as worn bushes can lead to poor handling and uneven tyre wear. Tyre condition remains a red flag—failing twice on tread depth suggests basic upkeep was skipped, so inspect for uneven wear, bulges, or dry rot, especially on the nearside front and rear. The sub-frame corrosion, while not yet critical, should be assessed for spread or structural compromise, as Audi’s aluminium-intensive construction can hide deeper rust issues behind surface panels. Finally, verify that the parking brake has been serviced recently, as its inefficiency in 2023 may recur if cables or drums have degraded further. The headlamp failure, though resolved, could reappear if bulbs or wiring were only superficially fixed. Given the car’s age and the history of reactive maintenance, a pre-purchase inspection by a trusted mechanic—focusing on brakes, suspension, and corrosion—is strongly advised before committing to a purchase.