2006 Mitsubishi Colt 1.3L Petrol · RF06 BVT

The most recent MOT, carried out on 24 June 2025, resulted in a failure. The test highlighted a worn front brake disc, a persistent engine malfunction indicator lamp, severely deteriorated ball‑joint dust covers on both front suspension arms and a headlamp aim that was out of tolerance. Over the preceding five years the vehicle has alternated between passes and failures, but each pass has been accompanied by a growing list of advisories and recurring defects – notably the side‑repeaters, wheel‑bearing noise, tyre perishing and increasing under‑body corrosion. The pattern is clearly one of deteriorating condition rather than stabilisation, with new major items appearing each year. At 112,803 miles on a 2006 model the average annual mileage works out at roughly 5,600 miles, which is low for a vehicle of this age. Such modest usage often points to long periods of inactivity or very gentle driving, both of which can accelerate age‑related wear on rubber components, corrosion of suspension mounting points and battery depletion, even though the engine and drivetrain have not been heavily stressed. The low mileage does not offset the fact that the car is now twenty years old, so age‑related degradation will dominate the wear profile. A prospective buyer should give particular attention to the front braking system – the discs were flagged as scored and pitted and may be close to the minimum thickness limit; measuring the disc thickness and checking for uneven wear or excessive run‑out is essential, and the pads should be inspected for glazing. The persistent MIL warning must be investigated with a diagnostic scan to confirm that there is no underlying engine fault, as an intermittent sensor issue can mask a more serious problem. The side repeaters (directional indicators) failed to operate in the latest test and should be verified for correct operation and proper wiring, while the headlamp aim should be checked and adjusted if necessary to avoid illegal glare. The ball‑joint dust covers on both front arms are severely deteriorated, indicating that dirt and moisture may be entering the joint; the joints themselves should be examined for excessive play or knocking, and replacement of the dust covers or the joints may be required. The off‑side rear wheel bearing was noted as slightly noisy; a hands‑on inspection for play and a test‑drive for humming or growling will reveal whether bearing replacement is imminent. Tyre condition is another concern – a nail was recorded in the nearside rear tyre and the tyres have shown signs of cracking and perishing; all four tyres should be examined for sidewall dry‑rot, tread depth and any embedded objects, with replacement likely needed given the age of the rubber. Beyond the specific defects, the buyer should conduct a thorough visual inspection for under‑body corrosion, especially around the rear suspension mounting points and the front subframe where previous advisories have been issued. Verify that the steering rack gaiter is intact and that the anti‑roll bar ball‑joint dust cover is still sealing, as ingress of dirt can lead to premature wear of steering components. Ensure the battery is securely mounted, test its voltage and cranking performance, and consider its age – a two‑decade‑old battery is likely to be near the end of its service life. Finally, confirm that the coolant, brake fluid and engine oil have been changed in accordance with a 2‑year or 30,000‑mile interval; fluid samples should be inspected for colour and contamination, and any signs of leaks should be addressed before committing to purchase. A comprehensive test‑drive looking for suspension clunks, steering binding, brake pedal pulsation or shudder, and any abnormal engine or exhaust noises will give a clear indication of the car’s current roadworthiness.