Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid

2005 Nissan Micra 1.2L Petrol · RF55 LFZ

RF55 LFZ

2005 Nissan Micra (1.2L, petrol). First registered 31/10/2005. Recorded mileage 50,020 miles. MOT valid until 21/07/2027.

Make & Model
NISSAN MICRA
Year / Origin
2005 · Reading
MOT Status
Valid until 21/07/2027
Road Tax
Recorded Mileage
50,020 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Check Required (Pre-Euro 4 Petrol)
Fuel & Engine
Petrol · 1.2L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 21/07/2027
Tax Status
Checking...
Checking DVLA database...
Fuel Type
Petrol
Year
2005
Engine
1240cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

A concerning pattern of structural and suspension deterioration has emerged on this 2005 Nissan Micra, with the most recent test on 15 July 2026 passing only after the vehicle had failed just two days earlier on 13 July 2026. That initial failure was driven entirely by lighting and visibility defects, including an inoperative nearside front position lamp, a severely reduced offside headlamp output from a product-coated lens, an obviously incorrect headlamp aim, and an ineffective nearside windscreen wiper. While these items can be addressed through straightforward rectification, the underlying advisory pattern is more troubling. The offside front suspension arm wishbone rear bush has now been flagged across two consecutive tests (2025 and 2026), and structural advisories have appeared for the first time on both the nearside and offside rear inner sill and floor areas, indicating corrosion that has not yet compromised rigidity but signals an accelerating corrosion process on a 21-year-old bodyshell. A previous driver airbag failure was recorded twice in 2022 and 2023, though the item subsequently cleared and did not recur in later tests. With recorded mileage of 50,020 against a vehicle age of 21 years, this Micra averages only around 2,380 miles per year, which is exceptionally low for its age bracket. The mileage progression between tests appears broadly consistent with light, short-journey use, and there are no obvious gaps or sudden jumps in the recorded odometer readings. However, low annual mileage on an older vehicle can be a double-edged proposition mechanically, as prolonged standing periods tend to accelerate rubber component degradation, oxidise brake discs and calipers through lack of use, and starve the engine and gearbox of the thermal cycling needed to evaporate internal moisture. The recurring suspension bush wear and the headlamp lens deterioration are both consistent with this type of usage profile, where elastomers harden and exterior plastic components oxidise during extended inactivity. Any prospective buyer should focus the physical inspection on the items actually flagged in the MOT record. The offside front wishbone rear bush advisory warrants a careful road test over uneven surfaces and speed bumps, listening for clonking or knocking from the front suspension and feeling for imprecise steering response or vibration through the wheel. On the underside, the inner sill and floor corrosion advisories should prompt a thorough examination on a ramp or with a torch, paying particular attention to the jacking points, seat belt anchorages, and any boxed sections where surface corrosion can mask more significant structural loss. A magnet or light tapping with a screwdriver can help distinguish solid metal from bubbling rust. The headlamp aim and lens condition should be checked at night against a wall to confirm both pattern sharpness and correct beam orientation, while the windscreen wiper linkage and park position should be observed in operation for any streaking or inconsistent contact with the glass. Beyond the flagged components, several other age-related items merit close attention on this Micra. The nearside front tyre cracking and perishing advisory from 2025 should prompt a careful examination of all four tyres for sidewall crazing, and any tyre older than six years should be regarded with caution regardless of tread depth. The 2025 advisory noting an insecure offside front body component, likely a trim or undertray fastener, should be verified as properly secured. Given the recurring airbag supplementary restraint defect in 2022 and 2023, it is worth confirming with the vendor whether a recall rectification was completed or whether a replacement clockspring or airbag module was fitted, and whether any warning lights remain on the instrument cluster. Finally, given the very low mileage, the brake discs and calipers should be examined for surface corrosion and seized slider pins, and the exhaust system should be checked for internal rot at the mounting rubbers and joints, as these are common failure points on vehicles that see only light use over many years.

RF55 LFZ Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 15/07/2026
  • 50,020 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 1 historical MOT failure
  • 3 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring lighting items (5 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

Updating live data
MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
80
/ 100 · Good
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Good

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
! Tax Status Unknown
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for RF55LFZ

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

RF55 LFZ Mileage History

  1. 15/07/202344,804 mi
  2. 15/07/202447,155 mi+2,351 mi
  3. 16/07/202548,549 mi+1,394 mi
  4. 13/07/202650,020 mi+1,471 mi
  5. 15/07/202650,020 mi

Average of roughly 1,738 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

RF55 LFZ MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 3 Sept 2026, 23:33
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2005 Nissan Micra (RF55 LFZ) between July 2023 and July 2026.

The record contains 4 passes and 1 failure.

The most recent test on 15 July 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 1 failure that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Lighting (5 issues), Bodywork (5 issues), Suspension (3 issues), Tyres (1 issue), Windscreen (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 10 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

Recorded failure items include: “Offside Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced (4.1.4 (b))”; “Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))”; “Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))”.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY