2012 SEAT Leon 2.0L Diesel · SK12 APO

The 2012 SEAT Leon’s most recent MOT tests—conducted just five months ago on 20 February 2026—show an unusual but technically stable roadworthiness pattern. Both tests at 107,027 miles were recorded as passed and failed simultaneously, which suggests either a technical error in the DVSA system or a deliberate double-entry, as no defects were logged. The preceding tests in February 2025 and February 2024 also show identical passed/failed pairs at 100,730 and 94,198 miles respectively, reinforcing the likelihood of an administrative anomaly rather than a mechanical trend. Without genuine failures or advisories, there is no evidence of worsening issues in suspension, brakes, or structural integrity. However, the repeated double-recordings raise questions about the vehicle’s history tracking, as they obscure any potential real-world maintenance patterns. The recorded mileage of 107,027 miles over 14 years aligns with an average of approximately 7,600 miles per year, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. The intervals between tests are consistent—around 12 months—with no significant gaps or abrupt mileage jumps that would suggest extended periods of disuse or rapid wear. The uniformity in mileage accumulation between February 2024 (94,198 miles) and February 2026 (107,027 miles) indicates steady usage without extreme variations. However, the lack of intermediate MOTs or service records means there is no visible evidence of proactive maintenance or repairs between tests. Given the absence of recorded defects or advisories, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of high-wear components that are not routinely checked during MOTs. Focus on the suspension system—particularly the condition of coil springs, bushes, and dampers—since these are critical for ride quality and handling but often overlooked between tests. The brakes, while not explicitly failed, warrant scrutiny for uneven wear, binding calipers, or corrosion on the rear discs, as these issues can develop gradually. Additionally, examine the underbody for signs of structural corrosion, especially around the wheel arches and sills, as this is a common failure point in vehicles of this age. The double-recorded MOTs also warrant confirmation of the vehicle’s full service history, as discrepancies in official documentation may indicate incomplete or omitted maintenance.