Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid
Road Tax Paid

2005 Toyota Corolla 1.6L Petrol · SV55 FJD

SV55 FJD

2005 Toyota Corolla (1.6L, petrol). First registered 30/11/2005. Recorded mileage 87,833 miles. MOT valid until 13/09/2027. Taxed until 01/09/2027.

Make & Model
TOYOTA COROLLA
Year / Origin
2005 · Aberdeen
MOT Status
Valid until 13/09/2027
Road Tax
Taxed (01/09/2027)
Recorded Mileage
87,833 mi
ULEZ Compliance
Check Required (Pre-Euro 4 Petrol)
Fuel & Engine
Petrol · 1.6L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 13/09/2027
Tax Status
Taxed
Tax due 01/09/2027
Fuel Type
Petrol
Year
2005
Engine
1598cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

The 2005 Toyota Corolla carries a substantial record of recurring mechanical advisories across five consecutive MOTs spanning 2020 to 2026, with the most recent test on 2026-09-08 resulting in a pass despite persistent issues. The vehicle experienced a failed MOT in October 2024 due to headlamp aiming discrepancies, brake pipe corrosion throughout the braking assembly, and a defective windscreen wiper blade, followed by another failed attempt in October 2024 before finally clearing the 2026 examination. While the latest result confirms regulatory compliance, the pattern of repeated failures—particularly the corroded subframes, deteriorating coil springs, and compromised brake piping—demonstrates that the car has not remained free of mechanical concern despite intermittent repairs. The overall trajectory shows a vehicle that has managed to pass each subsequent test but continues to accumulate the same categories of defects, indicating that passing an MOT does not necessarily reflect underlying structural integrity or long-term reliability. The recorded mileage of 87,833 miles accumulated over approximately 21 years yields an average annual distance of roughly 4,180 miles, which is notably lower than the typical consumption rate for a modern Corolla and aligns with the observation that the vehicle has been under relatively light use. However, this low odometer reading should not be interpreted as evidence of pristine condition, as the historical test data reveals that the car has already suffered significant degradation in critical systems. The gap between the last known failure in late 2024 and the successful 2026 test suggests that while the immediate problems were addressed, the underlying causes—such as progressive subframe rust, corroded coil springs, and compromised brake pipe integrity—remain present and require verification. The combination of low mileage and a history of multiple technical failures creates a scenario where the vehicle's operational safety depends heavily on whether the identified corrosion and wear have been fully resolved or merely stabilized. The subframe corrosion presents the most serious structural concern, with advisories noting that both the front and rear sub-frames have developed corrosion that compromises their ability to maintain proper chassis geometry. On a test drive, the buyer should pay close attention to any play or looseness in the suspension linkages, particularly the near-side front track rod end ball joint and the front anti-roll bar linkage ball joint, which showed slight play in both the 2026 and earlier MOTs. These components are susceptible to wear and misalignment over time, and the presence of such faults indicates that the subframe work required to repair them may not have been comprehensive. Additionally, the brake pipe corrosion reported across several MOTs—ranging from mild grease coverage to heavy coating on all metal brake pipes—warrants a thorough visual inspection during the test phase. Listen for any abnormal noises when applying the brakes, especially if the car encounters bumps or changes speed, as corroded brake pipes can develop internal blockages or leak under pressure. Coil spring deterioration represents another critical area of concern, as four separate MOTs have recorded the entire set of coil springs as corroded, with one instance specifically noting the near-side rear upper coil spring mounting as "getting very rusty." During a test drive, the buyer should monitor the handling characteristics, particularly during cornering and deceleration, as corroded springs can lose their load-bearing capacity and cause uneven weight transfer. The front and rear subframe corrosion often works in tandem with spring deterioration, as the subframes bear the full load of the suspension and can amplify flex or binding when combined with corroded spring mounts. Finally, the anti-roll bar linkage issues, evidenced by slight play in both the front and rear anti-roll bars across multiple tests, should be checked for excessive play when the steering wheel is turned, as this can affect stability control and increase tire wear. A complete inspection by a qualified technician is strongly recommended before acquisition, focusing on the integrity of the subframe, the condition of the brake piping, and the functionality of the coil springs and anti-roll bar assemblies to ensure the vehicle meets safe operating standards.

SV55 FJD Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 08/09/2026
  • 87,833 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 1 historical MOT failure
  • 7 defects noted at the latest MOT
  • Recurring brakes items (11 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
85
/ 100 · Good
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Good

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
! Older vehicle
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for SV55FJD

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

May be subject to ULEZ charges

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

SV55 FJD Mileage History

  1. 21/10/202379,211 mi
  2. 21/10/202481,478 mi+2,267 mi
  3. 21/10/202481,478 mi
  4. 15/09/202581,694 mi+216 mi
  5. 08/09/202687,833 mi+6,139 mi

Average of roughly 2,989 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

SV55 FJD MOT History

Vehicle record last updated: 10 Sept 2026, 02:00
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2005 Toyota Corolla (SV55 FJD) between October 2023 and September 2026.

The record contains 4 passes and 1 failure.

The most recent test on 08 September 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 1 failure that buyers may want to investigate.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Brakes (11 issues), Suspension (10 issues), Bodywork (5 issues), Lighting (4 issues), Windscreen (2 issues). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 37 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY