2010 Nissan Note 1.4L Petrol · WG60 FZN

This Nissan Note has demonstrated a consistent roadworthiness record over its most recent five MOT cycles, with each test conducted at precisely one-year intervals and all passing without defects or advisories. The November 2025 test at 54,792 miles confirms the vehicle remains free from major mechanical or structural failings, though the absence of any recorded issues across all five tests does not preclude hidden wear—particularly in high-stress components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or brake calipers. The tester’s failure to flag even minor advisories suggests either diligent servicing or a vehicle that has not yet reached critical thresholds for common failure points. However, the lack of any advisories also means there is no historical data to indicate how previous owners addressed potential concerns before they became failings. The mileage progression of roughly 3,400 miles annually—consistent over the past six years—indicates light usage, which may reduce wear on consumables like tyres, brakes, and clutch components. There are no abrupt jumps or prolonged stagnation periods in the record, though the low annual mileage could imply extended periods of storage, which may have allowed for corrosion to develop in underbody areas, wheel arches, or suspension mounts. The most recent test in November 2025 was conducted just eight months ago, meaning the vehicle has not yet reached its next MOT due date. While this suggests recent compliance, it also means no recent professional inspection has verified the condition of items like brake fluid condition, suspension alignment, or exhaust system integrity. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an in-person inspection of suspension components, particularly the rear suspension bushes and coil springs, which are prone to fatigue over 16 years. The brakes, despite no recorded failings, should be checked for uneven wear, binding calipers, or corrosion on the rear discs—common issues in lightly used vehicles that may have sat for extended periods. Underbody corrosion, especially around the sills, wheel arches, and exhaust system, warrants close examination, as low mileage does not necessarily correlate with rust-free conditions. Finally, the condition of the tyres—both tread depth and lateral wear—should be verified, as failing twice on tread in a similar vehicle would indicate neglect, though this record shows no such history. A thorough check of fluid levels (brake, power steering, coolant) and a test drive to assess for unusual noises or handling inconsistencies would further clarify the vehicle’s true condition.