2020 Hyundai Ioniq 1.6L Hybrid electric (clean) · WN70 BNY

The Hyundai Ioniq’s most recent MOT test on 2025-05-12 at 41,202 miles passed without defects, but the immediate preceding test on 2025-05-09—just three days earlier—failed for an unspecified reason despite identical mileage. This abrupt reversal suggests either a temporary administrative error or a critical component failing just before the final inspection. The prior MOT history from 2024 and 2023 shows identical patterns: two tests at the same mileage, one passing and one failing, with no defects logged. This inconsistency implies either a test centre anomaly or a recurring issue that narrowly avoided detection, though no specific faults are documented. The trend is unstable, with no clear resolution to the underlying problem. The recorded mileage progression reveals a steady but typical usage pattern for a vehicle of this age. From 19,817 miles in May 2023 to 28,376 miles in May 2024—a 8,559-mile increase—followed by another 12,826 miles to 41,202 miles by May 2025, the annual average remains consistent at around 6,867 miles. There are no abrupt spikes or prolonged stagnation periods, which suggests the vehicle was driven regularly without prolonged neglect. However, the repeated MOT tests at identical mileages—particularly the 2024 and 2025 cycles—are unusual and warrant closer scrutiny, as they imply either a systematic oversight or a component prone to intermittent failure. Given the lack of specific defect details in the MOT record, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of high-wear areas that often trigger MOT failures. The repeated test failures at the same mileage hint at potential issues with suspension components—such as worn rear bushes or coil springs—which might not always trigger a fail but could cause inconsistent braking or handling. Binding brakes, particularly rear calipers, are another common cause of MOT failures that might not always appear in the record but could lead to uneven wear or reduced efficiency. Structural integrity should also be checked, especially around wheel arches and sills, where corrosion can compromise safety without immediate visual signs. Given the vehicle’s age and mileage, fluid levels (brakes, power steering, coolant) and tyre condition—including tread depth and lateral wear—should be verified, as these are often overlooked but critical factors in roadworthiness. The absence of defects in passing tests does not preclude latent issues, so a thorough mechanical assessment is essential. The repeated MOT anomalies suggest either a pattern of deferred maintenance or a design quirk that demands vigilance. While the mileage history appears stable, the test inconsistencies indicate a need for transparency about any past repairs or replacements, particularly in suspension, braking, or emissions systems. A buyer should treat this vehicle with caution, assuming that any unresolved fault could reappear.