2010 Ford Fiesta 1.4L Petrol · WP10 CFM

This 2010 Ford Fiesta has demonstrated a stable roadworthiness trend over its MOT history, with no recurring defects or advisories recorded across six tests spanning nearly two years. The most recent test on 2026-01-31—just six months ago—confirmed the vehicle passed without failings, though the duplicate entry (one pass, one fail at identical mileage) suggests a minor administrative anomaly rather than a mechanical issue. There is no evidence of worsening conditions in brakes, suspension, exhaust, or structural integrity, though the lack of advisories also means no proactive maintenance notes have been documented by testers. The absence of corrosion-related failures is notable for a vehicle of this age, though this does not preclude hidden issues in less accessible areas. The recorded mileage of 91,543 miles over 16 years equates to approximately 5,700 miles annually, which is unusually low for a car of this vintage. The gap between tests—particularly the 11-month interval between the 2024 and 2025 MOTs—implies periods of inactivity, which could either indicate light usage or prolonged storage without maintenance. The consistency in mileage increments (around 1,000 miles between tests) suggests no sudden spikes in wear, but the low annual mileage may correlate with deferred servicing of consumables like brake pads, suspension bushes, or timing belt components, which could now be approaching their service intervals. Given the clean MOT record, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of suspension components, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, as these are common points of failure in this model at this mileage. The brakes, while not failed, should be checked for uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods. Corrosion should be scrutinised around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, even though the MOT did not flag rust—hidden pitting or weakened structural integrity could compromise safety. Finally, the engine bay should be examined for leaks or degraded hoses, as the lack of advisories does not guarantee these have been addressed. The duplicate MOT entry warrants confirmation of the vehicle’s true history, as discrepancies may indicate tampering or incomplete records.