2005 Citroen C2 1.1L Petrol · YR55 NNG

The Citroën C2’s most recent MOT test on 2025-11-25 resulted in a failure, though no specific defects were recorded—an unusual omission that raises immediate concern. This marks the third consecutive test within a year (2024-11-08 and 2023-11-17 both passed without issues), yet the November 2025 failure suggests either a procedural error in reporting or a critical component failing just outside the test thresholds. The lack of advisories or defects across all tests implies no recurring mechanical issues were formally noted, but the failure itself is anomalous and warrants further scrutiny. The vehicle’s roadworthiness cannot be confidently assessed without clarification on the 2025 failure’s cause. The recorded mileage of 119,968 miles at the time of the latest test reflects an unusually low average of approximately 5,700 miles per year over 21 years, which is well below the typical wear expected for this model. The gap between tests in 2024—just nine days apart (116,886 to 116,895 miles)—suggests either deliberate retesting or a misalignment in the MOT cycle. The jump from 109,743 miles in 2022 to 116,895 miles in 2024 (7,152 miles in two years) indicates sporadic use, which could mean prolonged periods of inactivity accelerating minor issues like tyre degradation or suspension stiffness. The absence of mileage spikes or large jumps implies no aggressive driving history, but the low annual average also hints at potential neglect in fluid changes or minor servicing. Given the sparse MOT record, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear coil springs and bushes, which are common failure points in this model. The repeated November testing suggests potential alignment or brake-related anomalies, so binding calipers, uneven tyre wear, or worn brake discs should be checked. Structural corrosion, particularly around wheel arches and sills, is critical given the vehicle’s age, as is the condition of the exhaust system for leaks or excessive rust. The 2025 failure’s unexplained nature demands verification of whether the vehicle passed a subsequent test or if the failure was rectified privately—this gap in transparency is a red flag.