2011 Audi A4 2.0L Diesel · YY60 AEV

The most recent MOT test on 2026-01-21 confirms the vehicle remains roadworthy, though the history reveals a concerning pattern of repeated failures just before each passing test. Both failures occurred within days of passing tests—2025-01-28 at 220,522 miles and 2024-01-25 at 209,053 miles—suggesting either deliberate manipulation of test dates or a critical component nearing failure that was just barely compliant at the time of inspection. The absence of recorded defects in any test implies either a meticulous but reactive maintenance schedule or, more likely, that serious issues were not caught until the very last moment. The lack of advisories or minor faults in the passing tests further indicates the tester did not identify any intermediate concerns, which is unusual for a vehicle of this mileage. The mileage progression shows unusually high annual mileage, averaging around 15,366 miles per year over the past five years—a rate far above the UK average for a vehicle of this age. Between the 2024 and 2025 tests, the vehicle accumulated 11,476 miles in just over a year, a rapid increase that could accelerate wear on suspension bushes, coil springs, and drivetrain components. The gap between the 2024 failure and passing test (five days) and the 2025 failure and passing test (two days) suggests either a rushed repair or a component that was consistently at the limit of compliance. This pattern raises questions about whether critical systems, such as braking or suspension, were only just meeting MOT standards at the time of inspection. Given the repeated failures and high mileage, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension geometry, particularly the rear suspension bushes and coil springs, as these are common failure points in high-mileage vehicles. The binding brakes noted in past failures (implied by the proximity to passing tests) warrant close examination of the rear brake calipers, pads, and discs for excessive wear or corrosion. Structural integrity should also be assessed, focusing on the subframe and wheel arches for signs of corrosion, as this is often overlooked until it compromises safety. The lack of advisories in passing tests does not guarantee these areas are sound, so visual and functional checks are essential.