2015 Peugeot 2008 1.6L Diesel · CP15 AAO

The 2015 Peugeot 2008’s most recent MOT history reveals a concerning pattern of repeated failures at identical mileages, despite no recorded defects on either test. The vehicle failed twice in June 2025 at 72,023 miles—an anomaly since the previous three tests (2023 and 2024) passed without fail at lower mileages. This suggests either a systematic oversight in test reporting, a critical component nearing failure, or a deliberate attempt to bypass inspection. The lack of defect entries in either the 2025 pass or fail tests is particularly suspicious, as even minor issues are typically logged. The vehicle’s roadworthiness cannot be confidently assessed without clarification on these failures, but the trend implies either a poorly maintained or deliberately concealed condition. The mileage progression of 6,548 miles per year aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, though the abrupt doubling of mileage between the 2023 (49,606 miles) and 2024 (55,460 miles) tests—just 5,854 miles in a year—followed by another 16,563 miles in 2024–2025 suggests inconsistent driving patterns. The 2025 tests occurred at exactly the same mileage, implying the vehicle may have sat unused for months before retesting, which could mask wear or corrosion. Without service records, it is impossible to determine whether critical intervals (e.g., suspension bush replacements, brake fluid flushes) were adhered to, but the mileage suggests consumables like tyres, brakes, and wiper blades may require imminent attention. Given the unexplained failures and the vehicle’s age, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system—particularly rear bushes and coil springs—for excessive wear or perishing, as these are common failure points in this model. The repeated test failures warrant scrutiny of the braking system, including rear caliper binding, disc runout, or master cylinder efficiency, despite no recorded defects. Structural integrity should also be assessed, especially around wheel arches, sills, and the rear subframe, where corrosion can compromise safety without obvious signs. The absence of advisories in prior tests does not guarantee these areas are sound, and a thorough visual and functional examination is essential before purchase.