2017 Ford KA 1.2L Petrol · GK17 ACF

The 2017 Ford KA has demonstrated a stable roadworthiness trend over its MOT history, with no recurring defects or advisories recorded across the last five tests. The most recent January 2026 test—conducted just six months ago—confirmed the vehicle passed without fail, despite the unusual dual entry (one pass, one fail at identical mileage), which may indicate a temporary administrative anomaly rather than a mechanical issue. There is no evidence of worsening conditions in brakes, suspension, exhaust, or structural components, though the lack of advisories or defects does not preclude hidden wear. The vehicle’s compliance with emissions and safety standards remains consistent, though the absence of any recorded faults means no prior issues were documented for targeted inspection. The mileage progression of 6,415 miles annually aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, though the gap between the 2023 (42,417 miles) and 2024 (44,693 miles) tests—just 2,276 miles in a year—suggests a period of lighter use. Conversely, the jump from 44,693 to 50,802 miles between January 2024 and January 2025 (6,199 miles) indicates more active driving. While this pattern is unremarkable, the abrupt dual MOT entries in January 2026—both at 57,739 miles—are unusual and may warrant clarification from the seller regarding the cause. No extended periods of inactivity are evident, which could imply regular, albeit moderate, maintenance. Given the clean MOT record, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of high-wear components not inherently covered by the MOT, such as suspension bushes and coil springs, which may exhibit fatigue without failing the test. The brakes—though never flagged—should be checked for uneven wear or binding calipers, particularly if the vehicle has been driven aggressively during the higher-mileage periods. Corrosion in wheel arches, sills, or underbody should be assessed, as the vehicle’s age increases vulnerability to structural weakening. Tyre condition, while not recorded in failures, should be verified for remaining tread depth and uniformity, as the MOT only tests minimum legal limits. The absence of advisories does not guarantee these areas are flawless, so visual and functional checks are essential.