2016 NISSAN NAVARA2.3L Diesel

The Nissan Navara has demonstrated a consistent roadworthiness record across its most recent MOT tests, with a clean pass in July 2025 at 108,834 miles and no defects or advisories recorded in any of the four consecutive annual tests. This suggests the vehicle has undergone regular, compliant maintenance without major recurring failures. The absence of any advisory notes—particularly those relating to suspension bushes, coil springs, or binding calipers—implies the structural integrity and braking systems have likely been preserved beyond the expected wear for this mileage. However, the lack of defects does not preclude gradual wear on consumables like brake discs, tyres, or wiper blades, which will require verification during an in-person inspection. The recorded mileage progression of approximately 6,500 miles per year—from 90,244 miles in July 2022 to 108,834 miles in July 2025—indicates steady usage without prolonged periods of inactivity or excessive wear. There are no gaps in the MOT history, and the intervals between tests align precisely with the annual requirement, reinforcing that the vehicle has been kept within legal compliance. While the mileage is typical for its age, the absence of any advisory notes on emissions or drivetrain components suggests the engine and exhaust system have been maintained without significant degradation. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an inspection of high-wear components that are not routinely tested. Focus on the condition of the rear brake calipers and discs, as binding or uneven wear can develop without immediate MOT failure. The suspension bushes and coil springs, particularly at the rear, should be checked for cracking or excessive play, as these are common failure points in this model. Additionally, examine the underbody for corrosion around the sills, wheel arches, and exhaust system, as these areas are prone to rust progression over time. Tyre tread depth and uniformity should also be verified, as the lack of MOT advisories does not guarantee they have been consistently replaced at optimal intervals.