2010 Ford S-MAX 2.0L Diesel · LF60 ACV

The latest MOT test for this 2010 Ford S-Max was conducted on 2026-02-18 and passed, though it did not eliminate the recurring advisories that have plagued the vehicle over the past six years. The pattern of advisories—particularly the persistent corrosion of both rear coil springs and front brake disc wear—suggests a maintenance trend that has neither significantly improved nor worsened, but rather has remained consistent in nature. The central exhaust mounting defect and tyre wear close to legal limits also indicate ongoing issues that require attention, though the vehicle has not failed an MOT due to these problems alone. The absence of any failures in the last two tests, aside from the minor registration plate lamp issue, suggests that while the vehicle is not entirely roadworthy, it remains in a stable condition for now. The vehicle’s recorded mileage of 137,680 miles at the time of this assessment represents a reasonable annual usage rate of approximately 8,605 miles per year, which is typical for a 16-year-old car of this age and class. This level of mileage does not necessarily indicate excessive wear beyond what is expected from normal usage, but it does imply that the vehicle has seen significant operational exposure over its lifetime. The absence of particularly high mileage spikes or long periods of inactivity suggests consistent use, though the lack of a service history or detailed maintenance records means that wear progression cannot be precisely quantified without further inspection. The most critical implication of this mileage is the accelerated potential for fluid degradation, suspension component fatigue, and brake system deterioration due to sustained load and friction. Given the recurring advisories—particularly the corroded rear coil springs and near-edge tyre wear—buyers should conduct a thorough inspection of the suspension system. Visually inspect the rear coil springs for any signs of further corrosion, which could lead to spring failure and potential structural instability. Listen for any unusual clunking or rattling noises during a test drive, particularly when the vehicle is driven over bumps or at higher speeds, as this may indicate worn suspension bushes or damaged spring mounts. The front brake discs show consistent but not excessive wear, yet their condition should be monitored closely, as further thinning could lead to reduced braking performance. Check for any signs of uneven brake pad wear or grinding noises, which may suggest binding calipers or warped discs. Additionally, the tyre wear advisories—especially the near-edge wear on the front and rear tyres—should be addressed promptly. Uneven wear patterns like these often indicate misalignment, incorrect tyre pressure, or suspension issues, all of which can compromise handling and fuel efficiency. Ensure the tyres are within legal limits and consider replacing them if they are worn to the 3mm legal minimum, as further degradation could lead to hydroplaning hazards. The central exhaust mounting defect and corrosion suggest that the exhaust system may require professional inspection for structural integrity, particularly if the vehicle is driven regularly. Finally, given the vehicle’s age and mileage, a comprehensive mechanical check should include a test of the 12V battery and starter system, as older vehicles are more prone to electrical failures. Check for signs of standing corrosion on the battery terminals and ensure the engine management system is functioning correctly by monitoring for any warning lights or performance issues during the test drive.