2015 Ford C-MAX 1.6L Diesel · MV65 AEZ

The 2015 Ford C-Max has demonstrated a stable but inconsistent maintenance pattern, with the most recent MOT tests occurring just over a year ago on August 8, 2025. Both the 2025 tests—conducted within hours of each other at 107,777 miles—were marked as failed without recorded defects, which suggests either a technical error in the system or a deliberate retest after a minor oversight. The preceding cycle in 2024 shows a similar pattern: a failure on August 27 at 92,128 miles followed by a pass on August 29 at 92,144 miles. This suggests the vehicle was brought in for retesting shortly after the initial failure, implying no unresolved mechanical issues were present. The 2023 test at 71,979 miles passed without incident, reinforcing that the vehicle has not faced repeated or progressive failures tied to major components. The recorded mileage of 107,777 miles over approximately 11 years equates to an average of around 9,800 miles per year, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps in service intervals, though the lack of advisory notes or defects across all tests means no red flags have been explicitly logged by the tester. The rapid accumulation of mileage between tests—particularly the 10,000-mile jump from 92,128 to 107,777 miles between August 2024 and August 2025—indicates consistent use without prolonged periods of neglect. However, this also means critical components like suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers have endured higher wear rates over time. Given the absence of recorded defects or advisories, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of high-wear areas that are not routinely checked in MOT tests. Focus on the suspension—particularly the rear bushes and coil springs—for signs of excessive play or corrosion, as these are common failure points in vehicles of this age and mileage. The brakes, while not flagged in MOTs, should be scrutinised for uneven wear, binding calipers, or corrosion on the discs, especially if the vehicle has been used in wet conditions. Structural integrity, particularly around the wheel arches and sills, should also be examined for corrosion, as this is a silent but critical risk in older models. The lack of advisory notes does not preclude these issues, so visual and functional checks are essential.