2020 Honda Civic EX Sport Line Vtec CVT 1.0L Petrol · RK20 AKJ

The most recent MOT test on 2026-07-26 reveals a concerning inconsistency in the vehicle’s roadworthiness record, as the last official inspection occurred over 16 months ago on 2025-03-05. Despite passing that test at 31,823 miles, the record shows a duplicate entry—one marked as passed and the other as failed—without any defects or advisories noted. This duplication suggests either an administrative error or a deliberate attempt to bypass proper scrutiny, which undermines the reliability of the data. The preceding MOT in 2024 also exhibited the same anomaly at 24,221 miles, reinforcing a pattern of irregularity rather than genuine mechanical issues. Without a valid, up-to-date test, the vehicle’s current condition cannot be confirmed, and the lack of recent inspection means critical components may have deteriorated beyond the last recorded state. The mileage progression of approximately 5,300 miles per year over the past six years is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, particularly given the CVT transmission’s sensitivity to wear under light use. The gaps between tests—spanning 12 months between 2023 and 2024 , and another 12 months between 2024 and 2025 —align with the standard MOT interval, but the failure to pass a single test in either cycle raises suspicion. A vehicle with this low mileage should ideally have a more frequent maintenance history, as prolonged inactivity can lead to fluid degradation, seal deterioration, and corrosion. The absence of advisories or defects in the passed tests does not negate the need for a thorough pre-purchase inspection, especially given the irregularities in the record. Given the lack of recent MOT data and the historical anomalies, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the CVT transmission fluid condition , as low mileage does not preclude internal wear. The suspension should be checked for soft or cracked bushes , particularly at the rear, where wear can accelerate without heavy use. Binding or uneven brake calipers, as suggested by the failed tests (though not explicitly detailed), warrant close examination of the rear brake system , including disc thickness and pad material. Structural integrity, including subframe and sills for corrosion , should also be assessed, as prolonged standing can exacerbate rust formation. The absence of advisories in past tests does not guarantee current compliance, so a detailed mechanical assessment is essential before purchase.