2015 Peugeot 208 1.2L Petrol · AF15 ACZ

The 2015 Peugeot 208’s most recent MOT test on 2025-07-08—just under a year ago—shows a clean pass with no defects recorded, though it is unusual to note a duplicate entry for the same date and mileage. This suggests the vehicle has maintained a stable roadworthiness profile over the past five years, with no recurring advisories or major failures. The absence of any advisory notes in the most recent tests implies that even non-critical components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or binding calipers have not been flagged for imminent replacement. However, the duplicate pass/fail entry warrants scrutiny, as it may indicate administrative confusion rather than mechanical issues. The recorded mileage of 71,627 miles over 11 years equates to approximately 6,500 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps in mileage accumulation—each test interval spans roughly 6,000 to 7,000 miles, suggesting consistent use without prolonged periods of neglect. The most notable jump occurred between the 2022 and 2023 tests, where mileage increased by 8,353 miles in just over a year, yet this remains within reasonable wear expectations for a car of this vintage. The lack of advisories or failures during these intervals further supports that the vehicle has been operated responsibly, though this does not preclude hidden wear on high-stress components. Given the clean MOT history, a prospective buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear axle where binding brakes or worn bushes could develop without immediate MOT failure. The brake discs and calipers should be checked for uneven wear or corrosion, as these components often degrade incrementally without triggering advisories until they reach critical thresholds. Additionally, the subframe and wheel arches should be examined for signs of corrosion, as this model is prone to rust progression in these areas over time. The absence of advisories does not guarantee these areas are flawless, so visual and functional checks are essential. Finally, the duplicate MOT entry should prompt verification of the vehicle’s service history, as discrepancies in documentation may indicate incomplete maintenance records.